2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-014-9298-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feminist Carnal Sociology?: Embodiment in Sociology, Feminism, and Naturalized Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent feminist writings have advanced some of the embodiment issues raised by McNay, in notable relation to theorizing the body and agency using (diverse) socio- and biological material perspectives (e.g. Barad, 2003; Haraway, 1988; Pitts-Taylor, 2015). However, further theorizing of the temporal aspects of embodiment is not discernible in these recent works.…”
Section: Embodiment Agency and Time In Feminist And Organizational Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent feminist writings have advanced some of the embodiment issues raised by McNay, in notable relation to theorizing the body and agency using (diverse) socio- and biological material perspectives (e.g. Barad, 2003; Haraway, 1988; Pitts-Taylor, 2015). However, further theorizing of the temporal aspects of embodiment is not discernible in these recent works.…”
Section: Embodiment Agency and Time In Feminist And Organizational Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In this way, basic image schemas serve as source domains for analogical meaning-making. This grounding of abstract domains in experientially basic domains is part of the recent interdisciplinary convergence on the fundamental “embodiment” of cognition (Barsalou 2008; Cerulo 2015; Glenberg 2010; Ignatow 2007; Lizardo 2009b; Pitts-Taylor 2015; Wilson 2002).…”
Section: Schemasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we contribute fresh insights to current sociological debates surrounding the sociology of the body, social agency and embodiment (e.g., Francombe-Webb and Silk, 2015;Shilling, 2016), and the need to theorise 'from' (not just about) lived bodies (Williams and Bendelow, 1998). Debates also crystallise around the linkage between the material body, mind, and world, including the 'natural' environment (Stevens, 2012) as well as the socio-cultural environment, as highlighted within carnal sociology (Crossley, 1995;Hockey and Allen-Collinson, 2007;Pitts-Taylor, 2015). Shilling (2016), in theorising the body as a socio-natural phenomenon, has called for sociologists to address as key topics the processes of embodied learning, and acquisition of culturally-structured practices (both occupational and sporting), including the significance of bodywork and the senses in these processes (Allen-Collinson and Hockey, 2015;Hockey and Allen-Collinson, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%