2019
DOI: 10.1080/0966369x.2018.1553859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feminist exploration of ‘populationism’: engaging contemporary forms of population control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, privatized approaches to reproductive health amplify broader inequalities in access to resources according to age, gender, geography, and race. Neoliberal discourses of empowerment and self-actualization through rational consumption of health services or goods such as family planning or facility-based delivery obscure the gendered and racialized anti-natalism of twenty-first century approaches to maternal and reproductive health (Bhatia et al, 2019;MacDonald, 2019). While the presence of misoprostol in pharmacies and hospitals increases access to safe reproductive health care for those who can afford the drug, it also abandons the most vulnerable women to cope with discriminatory abortion laws and under-resourced public health systems while aspiring to responsible reproductive behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, privatized approaches to reproductive health amplify broader inequalities in access to resources according to age, gender, geography, and race. Neoliberal discourses of empowerment and self-actualization through rational consumption of health services or goods such as family planning or facility-based delivery obscure the gendered and racialized anti-natalism of twenty-first century approaches to maternal and reproductive health (Bhatia et al, 2019;MacDonald, 2019). While the presence of misoprostol in pharmacies and hospitals increases access to safe reproductive health care for those who can afford the drug, it also abandons the most vulnerable women to cope with discriminatory abortion laws and under-resourced public health systems while aspiring to responsible reproductive behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although FP 2020 uses the language of reproductive rights and maternal mortality reduction to frame contraceptive use, it reanimates neo-Malthusian logics of population control that posit fertility in SSA as a threat to the economic, political, and environmental stability-"the abundant life" (Murphy, 2017)of wealthy countries in the global North (Hartmann, 2014;Bhatia et al, 2019). Such initiatives prioritize a technical solution-contraception-to complex social, political, and economic problems such as food insecurity, land dispossession, and disinvestment in subsistence agriculture (much of which is performed by women in SSA [Rodgers and Akram-Lodhi, 2019]).…”
Section: Theoretical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, women’s ongoing demands for reproductive health care and their reproductive well-being are heavily dependent on the availability and accessibility of health care systems. 34 Subsequently, reproductive rights knowledge is likely to be correlated with utilization of health care. We hypothesized that both utilization of health care and reproductive rights knowledge are likely to have significant effects on contraceptive use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second phase, from the late 1990s onwards, captured accounts of the diverse forms assisted reproductive technologies take in a range of settings, such as India (Bharadwaj 2006 ) and Egypt, though often among elites. We suggest that more recently there has been a focus on reflecting the experiences of more marginalised populations, captured in the work of Valdez and Deomampo ( 2019 ) (see also, for example, Bell 2014 ; Murphy 2017 ; Rudrappa 2015 ; Bhatia et al 2019 ; Davis 2019 ; Blell 2017 ).…”
Section: Studies Of Reproductive Technologies In the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We offer this article as a complement to a wider set of reflections in the burgeoning field of studies of reproductive technologies which are aimed at addressing forms of exclusion, discrimination and stratification that are perpetuated in both the application of RTs and the ways in which they are studied (Bell 2014 ; Rudrappa 2015 ; Valdez and Deomampo 2019 , Bhatia et al 2019 , Davis 2019 ; Benjamin 2019 ; Bridges 2011 ; Roberts 2017 ). We agree with Ginsburg and Rapp’s ( 1995 ) foundational argument about moving reproduction to the centre of social theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%