Geopolitics 2014
DOI: 10.4324/9780203092170-46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feminist Geopolitics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
101
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A notable exception comes from feminism, which has openly challenged the notion of an undifferentiated national subject, bringing gender into the picture (Anthias & Yuval‐Davis, ; McClintock, ; Yuval Davis, ). Feminist authors have contested the gendered identities produced by nationalism qua a male‐heterosexual project, which denies agency to women and portrays them, among others, as passive biological reproducers or as embodied national boundaries which can be policed (e.g., abortion law) or violated (e.g., war rape) (Blom et al, ; Dowler & Sharp, ; Mayer, , ; Sharp, ). Yet, the main preoccupation of feminist authors has been to broaden the notion of the (geo)political, breaking the public–private divide and making the body a central scale of power dynamics rather than interrogating the internal stability of the nation as a semantic referent.…”
Section: Banal and Everyday Nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception comes from feminism, which has openly challenged the notion of an undifferentiated national subject, bringing gender into the picture (Anthias & Yuval‐Davis, ; McClintock, ; Yuval Davis, ). Feminist authors have contested the gendered identities produced by nationalism qua a male‐heterosexual project, which denies agency to women and portrays them, among others, as passive biological reproducers or as embodied national boundaries which can be policed (e.g., abortion law) or violated (e.g., war rape) (Blom et al, ; Dowler & Sharp, ; Mayer, , ; Sharp, ). Yet, the main preoccupation of feminist authors has been to broaden the notion of the (geo)political, breaking the public–private divide and making the body a central scale of power dynamics rather than interrogating the internal stability of the nation as a semantic referent.…”
Section: Banal and Everyday Nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work on intimate geopolitics (Pain, ; Pain & Staeheli, ) provides a further contribution to thinking more critically on the relationality of care ethics. This line of research draws on interventions made within feminist geopolitics as “a lens through which the everyday experiences of the disenfranchised can be made more visible” (Dowler & Sharp, , p. 169) by prioritising “interconnections and interdependencies across scales, categories and border and also between things” (Mitchell & Kallio, , p. 2; emphasis in original; see also Hyndman, 2001; Mountz & Hyndman, ; Staeheli, Kofman, & Peake, ). “Intimate geopolitics” brings unabashed attention to the (gendered) body as a site of connection and disconnection, importantly through the ways it is deployed and enacted on through political violence.…”
Section: Relational Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of research from scholars engaging critical geopolitics and political geography more broadly has changed markedly in recent years on the back of feminist‐inspired calls to ‘ground’ geopolitics (see Dowler and Sharp ; Hyndman ). These shifts have led to greater interest in the everyday, lived experiences and emotions of diverse citizenries in geographies previously overlooked by state‐centric geopolitical traditions (e.g.…”
Section: Remembering Young People and Everyday Geopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%