2019
DOI: 10.1080/09718524.2019.1687799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feminist political ecology of agricultural mechanization and evolving gendered on-farm labor dynamics in northern Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as large-scale mechanization is becoming possible in some areas with increasing road connectivity on the hillside regions, this pathway of innovation, in addition to not being suitable for hillside farms, can reinforce traditional gender roles and cultural taboos against women operating equipment as Kansanga et al [10] discussed in their recent study. This can increase women's dependency on the few men in the countryside who are available to operate modern machinery [38].…”
Section: Policy Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as large-scale mechanization is becoming possible in some areas with increasing road connectivity on the hillside regions, this pathway of innovation, in addition to not being suitable for hillside farms, can reinforce traditional gender roles and cultural taboos against women operating equipment as Kansanga et al [10] discussed in their recent study. This can increase women's dependency on the few men in the countryside who are available to operate modern machinery [38].…”
Section: Policy Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart technologies are also being promoted as an integral part of Sustainable Intensification (SI) of agriculture even though SI aims to increase the agricultural productivity with less environmental damage and more social benefits [9]. The SI approach is widely promoted in south Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa with the aim to support smallholder family farms [10,11], however it also encourages the use of advanced technologies and in larger areas. Before such new technologies are considered, however, policymakers in countries, such as Nepal where hillside agriculture is widely practiced, should address the flatland bias of past and current technology transfer regimes and seek non-incumbent strategies for responsible innovation involving agricultural mechanization that supports the sustainable development of hillside farming systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study in Bangladesh, Theis et al (2019) show how women's ability to engage with opportunities for mechanized rice and wheat reaper-harvesters, was limited by a normative taboo on women operating machines, by restrictive norms regarding women's physical mobility and social interactions, and by normative expectations of women's deference to male authority. In their study of agricultural mechanization and gendered labor dynamics in Northern Ghana, Kansanga et al (2019) explain how farmwomen's honor and prestige are tied to normative expectations of hard work. From a study in East Africa, Njuki et al (2014) report that women's use of treadle pumps was considered inappropriate, as it exposed the outline of operating women's thighs (Quisumbing & Pandolfelli, 2010).…”
Section: Gender Differences and Adoption Of Laborsaving Agricultural Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social norms also tend to become embedded in the ways institutions function at different levels. In their study from Northern Ghana, for instance, Kansanga et al (2019) conclude that smallholder mechanization interventions feed into an agricultural system entirely underpinned by longstanding unequal gendered power relations, where laborsaving mechanization is framed as a masculine domain with little opportunity for women to engage and benefit. To be sure, in agricultural research and development, the term 'farmer' is widely associated with men and this translates to extension systems systematically disadvantaging female farmers (Farnworth & Colverson, 2015).…”
Section: Gender Differences and Adoption Of Laborsaving Agricultural Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation