2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fictitious Domain, parallel numerical method for rigid particulate flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(26). This result can seem surprising since some published studies present satisfactory results without any momentum forcing [23,27,75]. The difference is actually linked to the flow regime studied.…”
Section: Velocity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(26). This result can seem surprising since some published studies present satisfactory results without any momentum forcing [23,27,75]. The difference is actually linked to the flow regime studied.…”
Section: Velocity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Referring to the work [17], the speedup S N is selected as a parameter to measure the parallel performance, which is defined by…”
Section: Parallel Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose this example since it is widely used as a benchmark example for testing numerical models, e.g. fictitious domain methods (Glowinski et al 2001, Blasco et al 2009) and immersed finite element method (Lee et al 2009) with which we compare our numerical simulations. Figure 61 shows the vertical velocity and pressure profiles of the particulate flow with a single disk falling.…”
Section: Llnl-tr-645956mentioning
confidence: 99%