1956
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800090007x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Comparison of Eight Phosphate Fertilizers1

Abstract: Synopsis Differences in yields of corn from different phosphate sources were small, and in nearly all cases statistically insignificant. Fused phosphate produced a significantly higher yield of hay than any other source. Differences in yield from other treatments were insignificant. Regular grade superphosphate, concentrated superphosphate, and dicalcium phosphate produced the highest yields of potatoes; rock phosphate produced only about 60% as high potato yield as these even at double the P2O5 rate. The othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1965
1965

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various phosphorus sources, usually including superphosphate and rock phosphate, have been evaluated comparatively. Rock phosphate has compared well with superphosphate in some studies ( 2,3,5) and less favorably in other cases (1,4,8), depending upon soil type and fertility, the crop grown, and numerous other factors. The results seem to indicate a higher degree of specificity for use of rock phosphate than for that of super.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various phosphorus sources, usually including superphosphate and rock phosphate, have been evaluated comparatively. Rock phosphate has compared well with superphosphate in some studies ( 2,3,5) and less favorably in other cases (1,4,8), depending upon soil type and fertility, the crop grown, and numerous other factors. The results seem to indicate a higher degree of specificity for use of rock phosphate than for that of super.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%