Coastal Engineering 1992 1993
DOI: 10.1061/9780872629332.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Experiment on the Formation of Beach Cusps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cusps, although not as small as ours, have been also reported by Wright and Short (1983) as indicators of the early stage of beach front truncation. However, other studies attributed cusp formation to accretion processes only (Sato et al, 1992;Masselink et al, 1997). In Alassio, the relative absence of cusps on the drained segment is suggested as an indication of the efficiency of the draining to prevent erosion on the foreshore during some medium wave energy events of Hs b 2 m. At such wave energy cusps are expected to form (Short, 1979;Holland, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cusps, although not as small as ours, have been also reported by Wright and Short (1983) as indicators of the early stage of beach front truncation. However, other studies attributed cusp formation to accretion processes only (Sato et al, 1992;Masselink et al, 1997). In Alassio, the relative absence of cusps on the drained segment is suggested as an indication of the efficiency of the draining to prevent erosion on the foreshore during some medium wave energy events of Hs b 2 m. At such wave energy cusps are expected to form (Short, 1979;Holland, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have described cusp formation as purely due to accretionary processes with the horns experiencing more sediment accumulation than the embayment (e.g. Russell and McIntire, 1965;Sallenger, 1979;Takeda and Sunamura, 1983;Antia, 1987;Sato et al, 1992;Masselink et al, 1997); some have reported that they form due to erosional processes with the horns being residual features that experienced less erosion than the embayment (Smith and Dolan, 1960;Miller et al, 1989); and others have stated that they are the result of a combination of accretionary and erosional processes, occurring respectively at the horn and in the embayment (e.g. Kuenen, 1948;Otvos, 1964;Guza and Inman, 1975) as shown in the present experiment.…”
Section: Study Site and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%