A Field Procedure for the Assessment of the Centring Uncertainty of Geodetic and Surveying Instruments

Abstract

The uncertainty evaluation of survey measurements is a daily and essential task in any surveying work. The result of a measurement is, in fact, only complete when accompanied by a statement of its uncertainty. Miscentring, or centring error, is one of the sources of uncertainty in every basic survey measurement which may have a great effect on horizontal angle measurement for short distances. In the literature, different terms and values are considered to refer to this source of uncertainty. Standard ISO 17123 provides different procedures for assessing the measurement uncertainty of geodetic and surveying instruments, with the aim of checking their suitability for the intending and immediate task in field conditions. ISO 17123 is aware of the importance of uncertainty in the instrument centring, but it does not propose any standardised procedure for its assessment. In this study, we propose such a procedure following a Type A evaluation (through the statistical analysis of series of observations), avoiding using values from Type B evaluations (from manufacturer’s specifications, handbooks, personal experiences, etc.) that could be unsuitable for the conditions of the task. Uncertainty can be individualised for a particular instrument (which includes the plummet type), ground mark, operator, and other factors on which the results could be dependent. The testing methodology includes a configuration of the test field, measurements, and calculation, following the structure of each part of the standard ISO 17123. An experimental application is included with two different total stations, which also includes a statistical analysis of the results.

Testing of Homogeneity of Coordinates of Various Permanent GNSS Reference Stations Networks of the Republic of Serbia According to the Common Requirements for Proving Competence

“…“The uncertainty evaluation of survey measurements is a daily and essential task in any surveying work. The result of a measurement is, in fact, only complete when accompanied by a statement of its uncertainty” [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”

Optimising the Use of National CORS Data in the Context of Thailand

“…Some ISOs (International Organization for Standardization) also involve NCORS such as ISO12858, ISO17123 and ISO9000. To assure the quality of NCORS, the national regulators may refer to ISO 17123-8, which defines the requirements of geodetic and surveying instruments for field conditions (Heister, 2008;García-Balboa et al, 2018).…”

Accuracy Tests and Precision Assessment of Localizing Underground Utilities Using GPR Detection

“…To determine whether the distribution of GPR detection results was normal, we performed two types of tests: the Shapiro-Wilk test [57], which was treated as the primary test, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov [58]. Our choice was to compromise a broad set of similar statistics and their practical applications in land surveying [59]. According to the literature [60,61], the Shapiro-Wilk test is the best method to verify the normality of the data distribution, considering that the datasets are small, with potential outliers.…”