2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00116.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Study on Distance Education and Communication: Experiences of a Virtual Tutor

Abstract: In a field study on distance education and communication we varied the social presence of a tutor in four degrees: a tutor mediated by verbal, written information (condition 1), the same tutor mediated by written information and various personal views (condition 2), the same tutor mediated by written and spoken information (condition 3), and the same tutor mediated by text, views and spoken language (condition 4). Three hypotheses derived from cues‐filtered‐out (e.g. Short, Williams, & Christie, 1976; Spears &… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It, however, has to be remembered that the study investigated lectures with a large audience (on an average with more than 300 students who attended the examination). Important advantages of face-to-face courses over broadcasted content such as interactivity with a lecturer and co-students or the opportunity to build up a motivating social relationship with a lecturer (Paechter et al 2013;Schweizer et al 2001;Traphagan et al 2010) do not come into effect in lectures with such a large audience.…”
Section: Focus On Podcasts Neglect Of Face-to-face Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, however, has to be remembered that the study investigated lectures with a large audience (on an average with more than 300 students who attended the examination). Important advantages of face-to-face courses over broadcasted content such as interactivity with a lecturer and co-students or the opportunity to build up a motivating social relationship with a lecturer (Paechter et al 2013;Schweizer et al 2001;Traphagan et al 2010) do not come into effect in lectures with such a large audience.…”
Section: Focus On Podcasts Neglect Of Face-to-face Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And of course, instructors obtain an important task. In both online and face-toface settings, they can provide support by offering personalized feedback that links learning achievements to students' own efforts and performance (Schweizer et al, 2001;Paechter et al, 2020).…”
Section: Future Directions and Implications For Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paechter and others (2013) note that in the case of online communication it is easier to overcome certain inhibitions that make it difficult to participate in discussions or group work in case of face-to-face contact. On the other hand, it is emphasized that online communication via text channels (e-mail, Internet forums) is poorer by the whole spectrum of non-verbal means of communication (such as eye contact or facial expressions), which makes it difficult to obtain information about the mood of the interlocutor, for example (Schweizer et al, 2001). Communication between the lecturer and students goes beyond a simple form of dialogue and, apart from the exchange of ideas, also plays an important role in the stage of presenting and explaining the content taught, motivating and building mutual relations between the group members and the lecturer, as well as between the participants themselves (Brophy, 1999;Johnson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mooc Massive Open Online Coursementioning
confidence: 99%