1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0737-0806(06)81449-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field study on reproductive efficiency of mares maintained predominately on native pasture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(35% more). This was in contradiction with the supposed negative effect of lactation on fertility [6][7][8]. Instead of lower pregnancy losses [6] and other fertility results [49], maiden mares appeared as significantly lower reproducers (21% less than barren mares).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…(35% more). This was in contradiction with the supposed negative effect of lactation on fertility [6][7][8]. Instead of lower pregnancy losses [6] and other fertility results [49], maiden mares appeared as significantly lower reproducers (21% less than barren mares).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Data obtained from a field study with 145 mares under native range conditions and with only limited supplemental feeding, indicate that lactating mares in moderate body condition (<5, 1-9 scale) tended to skip a breeding season (Gibbs & Davison, 1992). Mares under a restricted feeding level presented a winter ovarian inactivity systematically advanced, longer and finishing later than well-fed mares (Guillaume et al, 2002).…”
Section: Effects Of Body Condition On Reproductive/productive Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few existing studies that consider maternal parity on fertility effects are controversial. While some found that parity did not affect fertility [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], others reported that mares that have never foaled have reduced embryo and fetal mortality compared to mares that previously foaled [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Confounding effects of maternal parity and age is probably the source of those discrepancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%