1999
DOI: 10.1006/geno.1999.5932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fine Integrated Map of the SPG4 Locus Excludes an Expanded CAG Repeat in Chromosome 2p-Linked Autosomal Dominant Spastic Paraplegia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical anticipation has been reported for 14q [Gispert et al, 1995] and SPG4 kindreds by Nielsen et al [1997], who reported CAG repeat expansion in six Danish families. However, clinical anticipation is apparently an infrequent finding [Fink et al, 1996] and recent studies excluded expanded CAG repeat in a new series of SPG4 families [Hazan et al, 1999b]. In the present family comparison between subject II‐2 and her offspring as well as individuals III‐3 and IV‐2 does not suggest clinical anticipation in accordance with Hedera's family.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Clinical anticipation has been reported for 14q [Gispert et al, 1995] and SPG4 kindreds by Nielsen et al [1997], who reported CAG repeat expansion in six Danish families. However, clinical anticipation is apparently an infrequent finding [Fink et al, 1996] and recent studies excluded expanded CAG repeat in a new series of SPG4 families [Hazan et al, 1999b]. In the present family comparison between subject II‐2 and her offspring as well as individuals III‐3 and IV‐2 does not suggest clinical anticipation in accordance with Hedera's family.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The haplotypes observed with these eight markers are shown in fig 1. The order of the markers is consistent with the physical map of the region. 22 Recombination events were observed for III.44, IV.4, IV.6, and IV.8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If these conjectures are correct, this would represent an unusual explanation of the dominant and recessive effects of different mutations in the same gene. This hypothesis was recently also postulated to explain dominant and recessive mutations in the connexin31 gene27 (a gene causing non-syndromic hearing loss), although as both dominant and recessive mutations in this gene were missense it was not clear whether the dominant mutations caused the disease through haploinsufficiency or dominant negative effects. If the latter is the case then the recessive mutations in this gene are likely to be null mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%