2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite analytic method for solving the 2-D time-dependent advection–diffusion equation with time-invariant coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ELMs, including the Neuman approach, LEZOOMPC, as well as the MOC, MMOC, and HMOC included in MT3DMS have been applied mainly under a Dirichlet boundary condition, with few exceptions (Neuman , ; Konikow et al ; Cheng et al ; Lowry and Li ; Herrera et al ). However, in the field, it would rarely be realistic to apply the Dirichlet boundary condition, because it is rare that the concentration of a source at a point will remain fixed in time regardless of changes in the accompanying flow field or in the local concentration gradient (Konikow ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ELMs, including the Neuman approach, LEZOOMPC, as well as the MOC, MMOC, and HMOC included in MT3DMS have been applied mainly under a Dirichlet boundary condition, with few exceptions (Neuman , ; Konikow et al ; Cheng et al ; Lowry and Li ; Herrera et al ). However, in the field, it would rarely be realistic to apply the Dirichlet boundary condition, because it is rare that the concentration of a source at a point will remain fixed in time regardless of changes in the accompanying flow field or in the local concentration gradient (Konikow ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%