2012
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2012.2188290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Difference Method for the Design of Gradient Coils in MRI—An Initial Framework

Abstract: This paper proposes a finite-difference (FD)-based method for the design of gradient coils in MRI. The design method first uses the FD approximation to describe the continuous current density of the coil space and then employs the stream function method to extract the coil patterns. During the numerical implementation, a linear equation is constructed and solved using a regularization scheme. The algorithm details have been exemplified through biplanar and cylindrical gradient coil design examples. The design … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And other one is continuous current densityspace methods which is more effective. Compared with traditional design methods such as target field method, the greatest advantage of IBEM lies in its flexibility and efficiency for arbitrary shaped structures [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And other one is continuous current densityspace methods which is more effective. Compared with traditional design methods such as target field method, the greatest advantage of IBEM lies in its flexibility and efficiency for arbitrary shaped structures [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the frequently used methods to 250 B. Garda and Z. Galias give preference to a particular solution with desirable properties is the Tikhonov regularization method (Sikora et al, 1980;Zhu et al, 2012). This method of solving LSQ problems is widely used when the linear system of equations is ill-conditioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the continuous-current density-based method is usually combined with other numerical algorithms such as the boundary element method (BEM) [6,[31][32][33] or the finite difference method (FDM) [34][35][36]. These numerical methods produce continuous current density profiles that can be used to obtain a coil-winding pattern with the aid of a stream function.…”
Section: Gradient Coil Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target field approach is commonly used for gradient coil design [20] and this method was formulated in a finite-difference framework in this thesis [34] and is briefly summarized here. For cylindrical gradient coils, based on the Bio-Savart law, the z component of the magnetic flux density can be derived as [34] z , , Generally, there are requirements to control one or more coil performance parameters during the gradient coil design, for example, power dissipation, magnetic energy etc.…”
Section: Finite Difference Methods For Gradient Coil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation