1991
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90021-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element and fatigue threshold study of shelling in heavy haul rails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65,66 The reason for that is a friction-induced shielding of the precrack leading to a decrease of the effective crack driving force ΔK IIeff . In the rail steel, Hellier et al 13 assessed the remote crack growth threshold as ΔK II,th ≈ 9 MPa m 1/2 (R = 0). It should be noted, however, that the shear-mode crack growth was associated with many mode I branches along the crack paths that contributed to deceleration and final bifurcation of mode II cracks.…”
Section: Mode IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…65,66 The reason for that is a friction-induced shielding of the precrack leading to a decrease of the effective crack driving force ΔK IIeff . In the rail steel, Hellier et al 13 assessed the remote crack growth threshold as ΔK II,th ≈ 9 MPa m 1/2 (R = 0). It should be noted, however, that the shear-mode crack growth was associated with many mode I branches along the crack paths that contributed to deceleration and final bifurcation of mode II cracks.…”
Section: Mode IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Moreover, the negative influence of superimposed out-of-phase cyclic compressive loading on mode III crack growth was observed and discussed in terms of smoothing the crack wake asperities and inducing tensile residual stresses. In fact, the systematic research in this field started only after 1970.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mode II propagation is concerned, no much literature deals with this topic, because it is not easy to control pure mode II propagation in laboratory condition, due its tendency to evolve in mode I. Mode II propagation thresholds and rates have been experimentally determined only for a few materials, with special laboratory equipments 16,19–22 . However, Biner 23 and Liu and Mahadevan 24 made some experiment of mixed mode propagation, even in prevalent mode II; they also elaborated some models for calculating an equivalent SIF, depending on both K I and K II .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a quantitative approach to this problem, it is evident that it is crucial to find an efficient method for calculating the applied mode II SIFs at subsurface crack tips, because this is the basic parameter for assessing both propagation threshold and growth rate. In the literature, an analytical solution is given only for a crack in an infinite body, known as the Griffith crack; other few solutions 19,20,26 have been obtained by numerical methods, such as body forces, boundary element (BEM) and FEM. The main drawback of these methods is that the model construction is usually complex and time consuming; therefore, in a crack growth process, only a few load cycles can be simulated in a reasonable time, as each step requires a re‐construction of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting investigation is the finite element analysis of shelling in heavy haul rails by Hellier et al [3]. An interesting investigation is the finite element analysis of shelling in heavy haul rails by Hellier et al [3].…”
Section: 3 Numerical Results For Shell Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%