2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element based algorithm for determining interfacial tension (γ) from pendant drop profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the bias usually observed for objective functions that are not based on the normal distance between an experimental data point and the theoretical curve is eliminated. This has been confirmed in [26].…”
Section: Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the bias usually observed for objective functions that are not based on the normal distance between an experimental data point and the theoretical curve is eliminated. This has been confirmed in [26].…”
Section: Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The aluminum temperature chamber was designed and manufactured at Purdue University (Purdue Central Machine Shop). The chamber is also used to obtain pendant drop images for surface or interfacial tension measurements that were discussed in a previous paper [26]. In the current configuration, a 0.025 cm o.d.…”
Section: Pendant and Sessile Drop Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measurements of dynamic surface tension have been made by the pendant-drop method in many cases, and various factors affecting the dada by this method has been examined; change of the temperature and mass concentration in water solutions, 9) change of the drop shape, 10,11) influence of the adsorption and diffusion in a drop, 12,13) film balance of a new Langmuir-type, 14) stress relaxation behaviour on the surface, 15) formation of shear-thinning and yield stress in fluids. 16) However investigation on the viewpoint of dynamics has not been conducted thoroughly.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Dynamic Surface Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%