1980
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0086904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method for the simulation of a Rayleigh-Taylor instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the work introduced in [3], implementing a PDE on a surface is affordable in the implicit framework with the level set method [9,22].…”
Section: The Sobolev H 1 Gradient Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the work introduced in [3], implementing a PDE on a surface is affordable in the implicit framework with the level set method [9,22].…”
Section: The Sobolev H 1 Gradient Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the content of this paper is not specific to a particular implementation of the contour evolution. In our experiments, we have used the level set framework [9,22,28,20,21], motivated by its numerical stability and its ability to handle topological changes automatically. The implicit framework also offers an elegant formulation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator [2] and of the average of a quantity along the contour [25].…”
Section: Numerical Experiments With the New Inner Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is based on variational image segmentation with level sets [22,37,11,34,38,12], and in particular on the method described in [8,5]. Level set formulations of the image segmentation problem have several advantages in comparison to other contour extraction methods.…”
Section: Level Set Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally proposed in [1,2] as a means to propagate interfaces in time, the level set method has become increasingly popular as a framework for image segmentation. The key idea is to represent an interface Γ ⊂ Ω in the image domain Ω ⊂ R 3 implicitly as the zero level set of an embedding function φ : R 3 → Ω:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%