1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02127700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method for interface problems in domains with smooth boundaries and interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
168
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For second order elliptic interface problems, it is well known that standard finite element approximations can converge slowly [18]. Optimal convergence rates can be restored if the finite element mesh is aligned to the interface [19][20][21]. For complicated interface geometries the construction of such a mesh may be very difficult; therefore, many researchers have developed numerical methods to treat interface problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For second order elliptic interface problems, it is well known that standard finite element approximations can converge slowly [18]. Optimal convergence rates can be restored if the finite element mesh is aligned to the interface [19][20][21]. For complicated interface geometries the construction of such a mesh may be very difficult; therefore, many researchers have developed numerical methods to treat interface problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a second order accurate approximation to the solution of an interface problem can be generated by the Galerkin finite element method with the standard linear basis functions if the triangulation is aligned with the interface, that is, a body fitted mesh is used (see, e.g., Babuška, 1970;Bramble and King, 1996;Chen and Zou, 1998;Xu, 1982;Karczewska and Boguniewicz, 2016 (Anitescu, 2017), or DPG, a discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin finite element method (Carstensen and Weggler, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to irregular geometry of the boundary and/or interface in many physical phenomena, a natural approach to the numerical approximation is the finite element method (FEM) with unstructured meshes that conform to the geometry of C and oX [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, meshing complex interface geometries can prove difficult and time-consuming when the interface frequently changes shape, especially in 3 dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm gives more control on the conditioning of the resulting linear system and specifically addresses the conditioning issues (see Appendix C) we found in the straightforward extension of [1] to 3 dimensions. We also give an expanded treatment of the discontinuity removal technique, detailing an algorithm for the construction of a scalar function satisfying the jump conditions (2) and (3). Specific to the 3-dimensional implementation, we describe an algorithm for creating a polyhedral representation of cell-local interface/boundary geometry and quadrature rules suitable for these polyhedral surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%