2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method to compute three-dimensional equilibrium configurations of fluid membranes: Optimal parameterization, variational formulation and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple solution to this issue is to then update the reference configuration Γ t0 . This kind of parametrization, proposed by Rangarajan & Gao (2015), generalizes the classical Monge parametrization, which is recovered by setting Γ t0 to a plane, M to its constant normal and h to the height of the surface Γ t with respect to the plane (do Carmo 2016). We finally note that for this kind of surface parametrization, we have…”
Section: An Ale Parametrization Based On An Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple solution to this issue is to then update the reference configuration Γ t0 . This kind of parametrization, proposed by Rangarajan & Gao (2015), generalizes the classical Monge parametrization, which is recovered by setting Γ t0 to a plane, M to its constant normal and h to the height of the surface Γ t with respect to the plane (do Carmo 2016). We finally note that for this kind of surface parametrization, we have…”
Section: An Ale Parametrization Based On An Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reference shows that scheme 'a' is highly accurate and performs much better than scheme 'A'. It is also shown that applying the stabilization stresses (47) and (48) only to the in-plane part is much more accurate than applying it throughout the system (i.e. in both Eqs.…”
Section: In-plane Shear and Bulk Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under quasi-static conditions, liquid membranes and shells therefore do not provide any resistance to in-plane shear deformations and thus need to be stabilized. Various stabilization methods have been proposed in the past, considering artificial viscosity [40,52], artificial stiffness [28] and normal offsets -either as a projection of the solution (with intermediate mesh update steps) [52], or as a restriction of the surface variation [48]. The instability problem is absent, if shear stiffness is present, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, bilayers are highly dynamical, but due to the complexity of the chemical and hydrodynamical effects involved, theory and experiments have focused on equilibrium. For instance, the classical bending model of Helfrich (Helfrich, 1973;Lipowsky, 1991;Jülicher and Lipowsky, 1993;Staykova et al, 2013) has been very successful in understanding equilibrium conformations (Steigmann, 1999;Capovilla and Guven, 2002;Tu and Ou-Yang, 2004;Feng and Klug, 2006;Rangarajan and Gao, 2015;Sauer et al, 2017), but is insufficient to understand the reconfigurations of membranes when subjected to transient stimuli. To address this challenge, models and simulations coupling membrane hydrodynamics and elasticity (Arroyo and DeSimone, 2009;Arroyo et al, 2010;Rahimi and Arroyo, 2012;Rangamani et al, 2013;Rodrigues et al, 2013;Barrett et al, 2016) or elasticity and the phaseseparation of chemical species (Embar et al, 2013;Elliott and Stinner, 2013) are emerging in recent years, but only provide initial steps towards a general dynamical framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%