2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-018-0290-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite-element model and experimental investigation of the influence of pre-straining of wire on the sensitivity of binary crack sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the sensor is installed in the field, the thickness of adhesive applied and the position of the wire within the adhesive layer will have greater variability. Using the FEM model, the impact of variability in adhesive thickness and wire positioning has been predicted . Using expected variation in adhesive thickness and wire positioning, the FEM predicts that the minimum crack opening that can be detected will be 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Optimum Position For Distributed Crack Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the sensor is installed in the field, the thickness of adhesive applied and the position of the wire within the adhesive layer will have greater variability. Using the FEM model, the impact of variability in adhesive thickness and wire positioning has been predicted . Using expected variation in adhesive thickness and wire positioning, the FEM predicts that the minimum crack opening that can be detected will be 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Optimum Position For Distributed Crack Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the FEM model, the impact of variability in adhesive thickness and wire positioning has been predicted. 40 Using expected variation in adhesive thickness and wire positioning, the FEM predicts that the minimum crack opening that can be detected will be 0.2 mm. Therefore, in this work, it is assumed that the minimum detectable crack opening for both the binary and fiber optic sensors is assumed to be 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Optimum Position For Distributed Crack Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%