1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(96)10557-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element model for asymmetric creep behavior of ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…due to preferential damage 4 or cavitation 6,7 in tension and/or related to the motion of hard particles in a glassy matrix 8 leading the material to creep faster in tension than in compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to preferential damage 4 or cavitation 6,7 in tension and/or related to the motion of hard particles in a glassy matrix 8 leading the material to creep faster in tension than in compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetric response is governed by the sign of the largest principal stress in magnitude. Lim et al 24 have pointed out that this model does not seem plausible when the difference in magnitude of tensile and compressive principal stresses is very small. Consequently, they propose that the viscoplastic strain rate is the sum of three viscoplastic strain rates developed, respectively, by the three principal stresses, each strain rate depending on the sign of the corresponding principal stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, accounting for the well-known asymmetry of ceramics creep behaviour is a key feature, from all points of view: experimental characterization, modelling and parameter identification. The tension/compression asymmetric creep of ceramics at high temperature is generally attributed to preferential damage [1] or cavitation [2,3] in tension, or to the motion of solid particles in a glassy phase during creep deformation [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many uniaxial creep laws exist that relate the strain rate to the applied stress. Some authors propose to explicitly account for the asymmetry by combining two different behaviours depending on the sign of the stress [2,6]. More generally, tri-axial stress fields usually consider that the strain rate tensor derives from pseudo-potential, function of the stress field, and is proportional to a scalar function that describes the uniaxial creep law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%