2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41871-018-0026-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Element Modeling Prediction in High Precision Milling Process of Aluminum 6082-T6

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these methods validate and support experimental studies and play a major role in determining solution sensitivity, effective parameters, and positive and negative factors on the problem (Shetty, Kumar, Mallagi, and Keni, 2021;Bolar, Das, and Joshi, 2018;Yılmaz, Dilipak, Sarıkaya, Yılmaz, and Özdemir, 2014). In many studies, analysis of variance (ANOVA), finite element method (FEM), linear and multiple regression models, Taguchi, ANN (artificial neural networks) and RSM (response surface method) methods were preferred (Yadav, 2021;Çiftçi and Gökçe, 2019;Davoudinejad, Doagou-Rad, and Tosello, 2018;Hazir, Erdinler, and Koc, 2018;Kumar, 2018;Chandrasekaran and Payton, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these methods validate and support experimental studies and play a major role in determining solution sensitivity, effective parameters, and positive and negative factors on the problem (Shetty, Kumar, Mallagi, and Keni, 2021;Bolar, Das, and Joshi, 2018;Yılmaz, Dilipak, Sarıkaya, Yılmaz, and Özdemir, 2014). In many studies, analysis of variance (ANOVA), finite element method (FEM), linear and multiple regression models, Taguchi, ANN (artificial neural networks) and RSM (response surface method) methods were preferred (Yadav, 2021;Çiftçi and Gökçe, 2019;Davoudinejad, Doagou-Rad, and Tosello, 2018;Hazir, Erdinler, and Koc, 2018;Kumar, 2018;Chandrasekaran and Payton, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the tools is defined in the ISO 3002-1 standard [3]. In addition, the knowledge of the geometry of microtools is the key for the development of new models for the prediction and interpretation of the chip formation process [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%