2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first look at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education anesthesiology milestones: implementation of self-evaluation in a large residency program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, self-evaluation, which is associated with higher-order cognitive and knowledge processes, is commonplace in many residency programs. [22][23][24] At the same time, most competencies not only neglect the highest levels of cognitive activity but also divest from the lower-order cognitive dimensions. This distribution may have been driven by the laudable goal of bringing students to the taxonomy's applicationbased dimensions as a response to a sense that medical education too often skews toward rote memorization and retention.…”
Section: Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, self-evaluation, which is associated with higher-order cognitive and knowledge processes, is commonplace in many residency programs. [22][23][24] At the same time, most competencies not only neglect the highest levels of cognitive activity but also divest from the lower-order cognitive dimensions. This distribution may have been driven by the laudable goal of bringing students to the taxonomy's applicationbased dimensions as a response to a sense that medical education too often skews toward rote memorization and retention.…”
Section: Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their findings of limited variability in milestone scores for residents in the same training year, Peabody and colleagues 12 contend that FM Milestones do not measure the amount of inherent ability possessed by a resident, but instead identify where residents are in their progression through residency, and identify residents with lower milestone scores than peers for possible remediation. This study adds to the growing body of literature that provides concurrent validity evidence that residents with higher levels of training have higher milestone scores, 12,[14][15][16]21,22 and lower milestone scores within a postgraduate year level may identify struggling learners. …”
Section: Relationship To Other Variables: How Do Results From Milestomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, a study at the University of Mississippi sought to reveal the utility of end-of-shift evaluations of EM residents by clinical faculty. 12 They concluded end-of-shift evaluations “rarely (8%, 372 of 4633) rated a resident as not achieving milestones.” 12 Other studies within anesthesiology, 13 general surgery, 14 and internal medicine 15 residency programs also highlighted the difficulties with evaluating residents and assigning them scores according to the ACGME milestones. Another study by Angus et al 16 surveyed Internal Medicine residents to assess resident perceptions of receiving feedback in the milestone framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%