2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0023223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first-principles Quantum Monte Carlo study of two-dimensional (2D) GaSe

Abstract: and telling us what having access to this work means to you and why it's important to you. Thank you.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(149 reference statements)
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noted that lattice constants of AFM ordering are slightly smaller than FM ordering for every functional and U values. As expected, PBE tends to overestimate the lattice constant, LDA tends to underestimate, and SCAN (meta-GGA) can achieve highly accurate lattice constants, as demonstrated in previous works 35,64 . For this reason, we used the fixed lattice constant and atomic positions obtained with SCAN (for FM ordering) for all subsequent DMC and DFT+U spin-orbit calculations (discussed later in this section).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is also noted that lattice constants of AFM ordering are slightly smaller than FM ordering for every functional and U values. As expected, PBE tends to overestimate the lattice constant, LDA tends to underestimate, and SCAN (meta-GGA) can achieve highly accurate lattice constants, as demonstrated in previous works 35,64 . For this reason, we used the fixed lattice constant and atomic positions obtained with SCAN (for FM ordering) for all subsequent DMC and DFT+U spin-orbit calculations (discussed later in this section).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The obtained observables such as binding energies, excitation gaps, vibrational frequencies have also been accurate and agreed very well with CCSD(T) results as well as with experiment [7]. In addition, DMC and related methods are applicable to much larger systems such as periodic models of solids in both insulating and metallic states, 2D materials, and systems with Email address: hzhou23@ncsu.edu (Haihan Zhou) other effective interactions such ultracold atoms and beyond [8,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…40 Even though DFT has led to transformative changes in our understanding of materials and chemistry and typically yields good results for ground state properties in 3D, especially lattice constants, it can yield widely varying results for the properties of 2D materials, such as lattice parameters and band gaps, depending upon the functional employed. Recent studies of 2D materials have shown that DFT consistently overestimates interlayer binding energies between 2D monolayers 41 and predicts lattice parameters that routinely differ from experimental ones by several percent. 42,43 In contrast, Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC), a real-space, many-body quantum Monte Carlo method, routinely predicts lattice constants within 1% and band gaps to within 10% of their experimental values for the same materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…42,43 In contrast, Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC), a real-space, many-body quantum Monte Carlo method, routinely predicts lattice constants within 1% and band gaps to within 10% of their experimental values for the same materials. [41][42][43][44] It is worth emphasizing that DMC obtains such high-accuracy results for all properties within a single, consistent framework with few approximations; moreover, the approximations can be systematically improved upon because of the variational nature of DMC. In contrast, obtaining accurate DFT results of different properties often necessitates using a different functional for each and every property, which substantially reduces the predictive power of such calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%