2019
DOI: 10.2478/pfs-2019-0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first synopsis of lichenicolous fungi of Mongolia, with the description of five new species

Abstract: A first synopsis of lichenicolous fungi of Mongolia based on new collections and literature data is provided, including 114 species. Five new species are described: Capronia cogtii (on Vahliella leucophaea), Echinothecium hypogymniae (on Hypogymnia bitteri), Feltgeniomyces mongolicus (on H. bitteri), Phacopsis vulpicidae (on Vulpicida juniperina) and Roselliniella javkhlanae (on Rinodina turfacea var. ecrustacea). Two new combinations are proposed: Endococcus hafellneri (≡ Stigmidium hafellneri) and Sphaerello… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019), Zhurbenko et al . (2019) and the present paper. Total counts for the ‘family as a whole’ may not reflect numbers in the columns as different species of lichenicolous fungi may occur on more than one host genus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2019), Zhurbenko et al . (2019) and the present paper. Total counts for the ‘family as a whole’ may not reflect numbers in the columns as different species of lichenicolous fungi may occur on more than one host genus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of species known to occur only on this genus. Based on data fromEtayo (2010),Zhurbenko (2010bZhurbenko ( , 2012,Diederich et al (2018a),Motiejūnaitė et al (2019),Zhurbenko et al (2019) and the present paper. Total counts for the 'family as a whole' may not reflect numbers in the columns as different species of lichenicolous fungi may occur on more than one host genus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…-This fungus is characterized by more or less superficial, subglobose, stromatic, pycnidioid conidiomata, 40-95 um in diameter, with wide, often splitted opening, sometimes eventually collapsed exciple (which makes the conidiomata look like sporodochia), conidiophores similar to stromatic cells, enteroblastic, terminal, discrete, ampulliform to obpyriform, sometimes percurrently proliferating, olivaceous brown conidiogenous cells, and olivaceous brown, solitary, subglobose, ellipsoid, oblong, narrowly obovate, occasionally cuneiform, reniform or irregular in shape, sometimes truncated at the base, aseptate, rough but not distinctly verruculose conidia. In the type material a distinct exciple was not observed apparently due to destruction in the later stages of development and the conidiomata were charactrized as sporodochial (Zhurbenko et al 2019). Additionally, the specimen cited here differs from the protologue in having somewhat longer conidia, (6.7-)7.8-10.6(-13.0) x (4.25)4.4-5.2(-5.9) um, L/B = (1.4-)1.6-2.1(-2.9) (n = 50) versus (5.4-)6.3-8.1(-9.3) x (4.0-)4.3-5.1(-5.5) um, L/B = (1.1-)1.3-1.7(-2.1).…”
Section: Feltgeniomyces Mongolicus Zhurbmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…found on species of Cetraria (the type host), Flavocetraria, Lecidea and Rhizoplaca (Darmostuk & Khodosovtsev 2019, Khodosovtsev et al 2016, Zhurbenko et al 2020). However, K. cetrariae can be distinguished by its holoblastic conidiogenesis and brown, not basally truncated, finally verruculose conidia (Khodosovtsev et al 2016, Zhurbenko et al 2019). This species was recently described from Mongolia where it was found on Hypogymnia bitteri (Zhurbenko et al 2019) and previously known only from the type collection.…”
Section: Feltgeniomyces Mongolicus Zhurbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation