“…-This fungus is characterized by more or less superficial, subglobose, stromatic, pycnidioid conidiomata, 40-95 um in diameter, with wide, often splitted opening, sometimes eventually collapsed exciple (which makes the conidiomata look like sporodochia), conidiophores similar to stromatic cells, enteroblastic, terminal, discrete, ampulliform to obpyriform, sometimes percurrently proliferating, olivaceous brown conidiogenous cells, and olivaceous brown, solitary, subglobose, ellipsoid, oblong, narrowly obovate, occasionally cuneiform, reniform or irregular in shape, sometimes truncated at the base, aseptate, rough but not distinctly verruculose conidia. In the type material a distinct exciple was not observed apparently due to destruction in the later stages of development and the conidiomata were charactrized as sporodochial (Zhurbenko et al 2019). Additionally, the specimen cited here differs from the protologue in having somewhat longer conidia, (6.7-)7.8-10.6(-13.0) x (4.25)4.4-5.2(-5.9) um, L/B = (1.4-)1.6-2.1(-2.9) (n = 50) versus (5.4-)6.3-8.1(-9.3) x (4.0-)4.3-5.1(-5.5) um, L/B = (1.1-)1.3-1.7(-2.1).…”