2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fitting formula for the non-Gaussian contribution to the lensing power spectrum covariance

Abstract: Context. Weak gravitational lensing is one of the most promising tools to investigate the equation-of-state of dark energy. In order to obtain reliable parameter estimations for current and future experiments, a good theoretical understanding of dark matter clustering is essential. Of particular interest is the statistical precision to which weak lensing observables, such as cosmic shear correlation functions, can be determined. Aims. We construct a fitting formula for the non-Gaussian part of the covariance o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the simplified log-normal approximation is as simple as the normal approximation, yet appears as accurate as the log-normal approximation. Moreover, the simplified log-normal approximation is simpler than several proposed approximations based on halo models (e.g., Takada & Jain 2009;Pielorz et al 2010). The simplified log-normal approximation is also more general than approximations based on empirical fits to numerical simulations Sato et al 2011b).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the simplified log-normal approximation is as simple as the normal approximation, yet appears as accurate as the log-normal approximation. Moreover, the simplified log-normal approximation is simpler than several proposed approximations based on halo models (e.g., Takada & Jain 2009;Pielorz et al 2010). The simplified log-normal approximation is also more general than approximations based on empirical fits to numerical simulations Sato et al 2011b).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting expressions for the covariance of lensing two-point statistics require considerable more effort to compute than the corresponding expressions in the normal approximation, even if simplified by fitting formulas (Pielorz et al 2010). A thorough assessment of the accuracy of the halo model approach to cosmic shear covariances (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which we calculate using the analytical formula given in Pielorz et al (2010). The dark matter profiles of adjacent haloes cannot overlap, which is prevented by implementing halo exclusion.…”
Section: Lensing Signal From the Halo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi analytical methods are available in the literature ( [31] and [32]), but rely on the assumption of Gaussian statistics. An extension to the nonlinear angular scales has been recently developed ( [33], [34] and [35]), however the three-point statistics and source redshift distribution and shape noise of realistic surveys were not considered. In this work the full covariance matrix C was estimated directly from the ray-tracing simulation as in [33] and [34], by taking into account the realistic characteristics of lensing surveys described in the previous sections.…”
Section: Estimate Of the Covariance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%