A Fixed Telescopic Prosthesis Designed to Retrieve and Convert to Fixed-Removable Combination Case: A Clinical Report

Zoidis, Panagiotis; Panagiota, Spyropoulou; Polyzois, Gregory

doi:10.15644/asc49/2/8

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6,11 Gupta et al 4 , manifestaron que la prótesis telescópica brinda las características de las prótesis fijas y removibles, siendo una alternativa de tratamiento viable para pacientes con displasia ectodérmica que presentan su dentición comprometida y son de bajos recursos. De forma similar, Zoidis P, et al, 12 reportaron la rehabilitación en un paciente periodontalmente comprometido con diabetes no controlada, utilizado por un período de seis meses.…”

Section: (Figura 3 a Y B)unclassified

Rehabilitation by telescopic prosthesis in a periodontally compromised patient

Falcón-Guerrero¹

2020

rmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reporte de Caso Rehabilitación mediante prótesis telescópica en un paciente periodontalmente comprometido Rehabilitation by telescopic prosthesis in a periodontally compromised patient Britto Ebert Falcón-Guerrero 1,2 1 Doctor en estomatología, Especialista en periodoncia e implantología. 2 Universidad Latinoamericana CIMA. Tacna-Perú RESUMEN El objetivo de este artículo es describir la rehabilitación de un paciente masculino de 76 años de edad con enfermedad periodontal, mediante una prótesis telescópica. Donde se realizó un tratamiento interdisciplinario, que incluyo, el tratamiento periodontal, la cirugía y la rehabilitación con una prótesis telescópica; logrando rehabilitar de forma exitosa su función y estética. El paciente manifiesta sentirse cómodo desde la instalación de la prótesis telescópica y del mismo modo, expresa que puede realizar su higiene diaria de forma más sencilla. Lo cual se evidencia a los 6 meses de control, donde se observa una buena salud periodontal de los pilares telescópicos. Las prótesis telescópicas, son una buena alternativa para los pacientes periodontalmenté comprometidos, mejorando significativamente su calidad de vida .

show abstract

Section: (Figura 3 a Y B)unclassified

Rehabilitation by telescopic prosthesis in a periodontally compromised patient

Falcón-Guerrero¹

2020

rmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, in cases where stress tolerance is crucial, composite resin veneers are often preferred due to their superior ability to withstand such stresses. This characteristic makes them a preferred material for use in telescopic prosthetics [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Composite resin veneers can also be used with zirconia frameworks [ 13 , 14 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength of Base Metal Alloys and Zirconia Frameworks

Dederichs,

Badr,

Viebranz

et al. 2024

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ensuring a secure bond between a framework structure and layering composite resin veneer is essential for a long-lasting dental restoration. A variety of primer systems are available to facilitate the adhesive bonding. Nevertheless, the growing preference for efficiency and simplicity in dentistry has made the one-bottle universal primers a desirable option. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of universal primers on the shear bond strength (SBS) of base metal alloy (BMA) and zirconia to layering composite resin. Each 160 BMA and zirconia 20 × 10 × 5 mm test specimen was fabricated. Eight different primers (SunCera Metal Primer, Metal Primer Z, Reliance Metal Primer, Alloy Primer, MKZ Primer, Monobond Plus, ArtPrime Plus, and Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus) were applied to 20 specimens in each group. Subsequently, a 5 × 2 mm composite resin build-up was applied. SBS tests were performed after 24 h of water storage and after thermocycling (25,000 cycles, 5–55 °C). On BMA, after water storage for 24 h, the bond strength values ranged from 26.53 ± 3.28 MPa (Metal Primer Z) to 29.72 ± 2.00 MPa (MKZ Primer), while after thermocycling, bond strength values ranged from 25.19 ± 1.73 MPa (MKZ Primer) to 27.69 ± 2.37 MPa (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus). On a zirconia base, after 24 h, the bond strengths values ranged from 22.63 ± 2.28 MPa (Reliance Primer) to 29.96 ± 2.37 MPa (MKZ Primer) and from 23.77 ± 3.86 MPa (Metal Primer Z) to 28.88 ± 3.09 MPa (Monobond Plus) after thermocycling. While no significant difference in bond strength was found between the primers on the BMA base, five primer combinations differed significantly from each other on zirconia (p = 0.002–0.043). All primers achieved a bond strength greater than 23 MPa on both framework materials after thermocycling. Thus, all primers tested can be applied to both framework materials with comparable results.

show abstract

“…As rigid attachments, they transmit all loads (axial, horizontal, and torque) directly to the abutment teeth [1][2][3]. Different types of double crowns are used for the retention of partial dentures in different countries [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9]. In addition, cases with significantly reduced residual dentitions and an unfavorable distribution of supporting teeth have shown high survival rates using double crown systems, suggesting that prosthetic rehabilitation with double crowns can be used in patients with an unfavorable distribution of remaining teeth [10,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Several in vitro studies have investigated the retention of double crowns with friction pins (DCP); however, clinical data on their long-term success have not been reported. We sought to evaluate the 5-year survival rate of DCPs in patients with severely reduced dentition (SRD) and not severely reduced dentition (NSRD). Materials and methods A total of 158 patients were treated with 182 dentures on 520 abutment teeth between 2006 and 2016. The SRD group included 144 dentures that had been inserted on 314 abutment teeth. We evaluated the influence of age, sex, jaw, number, tooth vitality, and abutment teeth localization (according to Steffel's classification) on the 60-month survival rates of dentures and abutment teeth using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, logrank test, and Cox regression. Results The cumulative 60-month survival rate was 84.3% (CI 77.1-91.5%) for all dentures; however, the survival rate in the SRD group (80.3%; CI 71.5-89.1%) was significantly lower than in the NSRD group (100%; p = 0.04). Dentures classified in Steffel's class A had the lowest survival rate (51.5%; CI 30.9-72.1%). Number, location, and vitality of the abutment teeth had a significant impact on survival rate. Conclusions DCP dentures showed comparable clinical long-term success to double crown systems that have been previously reported in the literature. The number, localization, and vitality of abutment teeth had the greatest influence on the survival rates of denture and abutment teeth. Clinical relevance DCP dentures have an acceptable 5-year survival rate. Clinical treatment planning must take into account key factors associated with the prognosis of the abutment teeth.

show abstract

A Fixed Telescopic Prosthesis Designed to Retrieve and Convert to Fixed-Removable Combination Case: A Clinical Report

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Rehabilitation by telescopic prosthesis in a periodontally compromised patient

Rehabilitation by telescopic prosthesis in a periodontally compromised patient

Effect of Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength of Base Metal Alloys and Zirconia Frameworks

Clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About