2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies

Abstract: Background Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous by a species, usually called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), could thus help further identify the impacts of artificial lighting on animals. Objective This review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFFs for insects and birds are significantly higher than for other classes, and CFFs for fish and amphibians are significantly lower than for other classes. The CFF for humans is typically in the range of [35][36][37][38][39][40], but in some cases, it extends up to 90 Hz [28]. How do these CFF ranges compare to the flicker rates in actual light sources?…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFFs for insects and birds are significantly higher than for other classes, and CFFs for fish and amphibians are significantly lower than for other classes. The CFF for humans is typically in the range of [35][36][37][38][39][40], but in some cases, it extends up to 90 Hz [28]. How do these CFF ranges compare to the flicker rates in actual light sources?…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the three primary colours of monitors have been carefully designed to recreate human-perceived colours of objects, but how they appear to species with different visual systems has not been experimentally tested. Second, a standard desktop monitor has a refresh rate of 60 Hz, which is too fast for humans to detect but appears to flash to a variety of animals that have a faster flicker fusion frequency (the rate at which a flicker becomes invisible) [ 66 , 67 ]. A honeybee would even detect the flashing screen updates of professional gaming monitors, whose refresh rates of 120–144 Hz fall below the honeybee eyes’ fusion frequency of 200 Hz [ 68 ].…”
Section: Consider New Confounds In New Set-ups: Research Animals Livi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By interfering with the "advertisement calls" used by male anurans during the breeding season to attract mates, pulsing lights have the potential to reduce reproductive success and recruitment in these species (Baker and Richardson 2006;Dias et al 2019). There is growing evidence to suggest that unpredictable changes in light intensity and stability (i.e., stable vs. intermittent light) can substantially alter animal behavior, but this aspect of light pollution remains understudied (Lafitte et al 2022;Pérez Vega et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence to suggest that unpredictable changes in light intensity and stability (i.e., stable vs. intermittent light) can substantially alter animal behavior, but this aspect of light pollution remains understudied (Lafitte et al. 2022; Pérez Vega et al. 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%