2010
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-5498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flaw in the model…that defines how the world works

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To resolve this, climate modellers use multi-model ensembles in their decision-making processes, acknowledging that ‘even if the perfect climate model did exist, any projection is always conditional on the scenario considered’ (Tebaldi & Knutti, 2007). Similarly, after the 2008 global financial crisis, over-reliance on equilibrium models by policymakers was recognised as both ‘ubiquitous’ (Bezemer, 2010) and ‘flawed’ (Bieta et al, 2012); leading to widespread calls for alternative approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve this, climate modellers use multi-model ensembles in their decision-making processes, acknowledging that ‘even if the perfect climate model did exist, any projection is always conditional on the scenario considered’ (Tebaldi & Knutti, 2007). Similarly, after the 2008 global financial crisis, over-reliance on equilibrium models by policymakers was recognised as both ‘ubiquitous’ (Bezemer, 2010) and ‘flawed’ (Bieta et al, 2012); leading to widespread calls for alternative approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%