A flexible 3G WebService based gateway for wireless sensor networks in support of remote patient monitoring systems

Eddabbah, Mohamed; Moussaoui, Mohamed; Laaziz, Yassin

doi:10.1109/mms.2014.7088936

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, connecting sensor networks to the internet will give additional value of remote flexibility. ZigBee and Bluetooth sensor networks can integrate with other networks such as Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), Enhanced Data Rate for GSM (EDGE) and 3G and 4G technologies to create wide area wireless coverage [18,19]. The GSM standard was created to provide a prevalent technology of the second generation for Europe [16].…”

Section: Capacitive Based Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) for Water Monitoring: A Review on Building Blocks and Factors to Consider During Design Decisions

Njuu¹

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, WSN based systems have progressively become an important technological advancement. Sensor networks are key in various aspects of life, such as home and industrial automation and health and environmental monitoring. In order to build a sensor based network relevant to a particular application environment, it is important for one to be aware of the current technological developments, as well as available options and techniques in order to make sound decisions. This paper discusses the main building blocks and factors to consider during design decisions of WSN for water monitoring. The paper focuses on the technology alternatives on the WSN subsystems, which are sensing, communication, and storage and processing subsystems. The technological options that are available on each of the subsystems are carefully analyzed and evaluated with regard to the water monitoring application environment. Furthermore, the factors that are important for the development and sustainability of sensor network systemscosts and power sources management are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Capacitive Based Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) for Water Monitoring: A Review on Building Blocks and Factors to Consider During Design Decisions

Njuu¹

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Wi-Fi network is widely deployed as a Network Access Point which allows the WBAN network to connect to the Internet. Wide area network (WAN) systems may be cellular networks such as GSM, GPRG, 3G / 3G+ [30], LTE, Wimax, or wired communication networks (ADSL, coaxial cable and optical fiber) , or satellite networks .…”

Section: Ban-based Rpm Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of a Smart Remote Patient Monitoring System based Heterogeneous WSN

Eddabbah¹,

Moussaoui²,

Laaziz³

2018

ijacsa

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many of these underlying wireless technologies that IoT systems employ, have been directly borrowed from Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) or Mobile ad hoc Networks (MANET), as they originally paved the way for the emergence of these new paradigms [ 4 ]. Thus, communication technologies employed by most IoT devices are those used in WSNs or MANETs—either Mobile Telecommunications Technologies (MTT), such as 3G/4G [ 5 , 6 ], Cognitive Radio (CR)-based solutions [ 7 , 8 , 9 ] or technologies operating in the 2400 MHz ISM unlicensed band, such as WiFi, ZigBee or Bluetooth [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the More Suitable ISM Frequency Band for IoT-Based Smart Grids: A Quantitative Study of 915 MHz vs. 2400 MHz

Sandoval

García-Sánchez

García‐Sánchez

et al. 2016

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IoT has begun to be employed pervasively in industrial environments and critical infrastructures thanks to its positive impact on performance and efficiency. Among these environments, the Smart Grid (SG) excels as the perfect host for this technology, mainly due to its potential to become the motor of the rest of electrically-dependent infrastructures. To make this SG-oriented IoT cost-effective, most deployments employ unlicensed ISM bands, specifically the 2400 MHz one, due to its extended communication bandwidth in comparison with lower bands. This band has been extensively used for years by Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET), from which the IoT technologically inherits. However, this work questions and evaluates the suitability of such a “default” communication band in SG environments, compared with the 915 MHz ISM band. A comprehensive quantitative comparison of these bands has been accomplished in terms of: power consumption, average network delay, and packet reception rate. To allow such a study, a dual-band propagation model specifically designed for the SG has been derived, tested, and incorporated into the well-known TOSSIM simulator. Simulation results reveal that only in the absence of other 2400 MHz interfering devices (such as WiFi or Bluetooth) or in small networks, is the 2400 MHz band the best option. In any other case, SG-oriented IoT quantitatively perform better if operating in the 915 MHz band.

show abstract

A flexible 3G WebService based gateway for wireless sensor networks in support of remote patient monitoring systems

Cited by 3 publications

References 11 publications

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) for Water Monitoring: A Review on Building Blocks and Factors to Consider During Design Decisions

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) for Water Monitoring: A Review on Building Blocks and Factors to Consider During Design Decisions

Performance Evaluation of a Smart Remote Patient Monitoring System based Heterogeneous WSN

Evaluating the More Suitable ISM Frequency Band for IoT-Based Smart Grids: A Quantitative Study of 915 MHz vs. 2400 MHz

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About