A Flexible Cap-and-Trade Policy and Limited Demand Information Effects on a Sustainable Supply Chain

Abstract

Carbon emission reduction is increasingly becoming a public consensus, with governments formulating carbon emission policies, enterprises investing in emission abatement equipment, and consumers having a low-carbon preference. On the other hand, it is difficult for industry managers to obtain all the demand information. Based on this, this paper aims to investigate operations and coordination for a sustainable system with a flexible cap-and-trade policy and limited demand information. Newsvendor and distribution-free newsvendor models are formulated to show the validity of limited information. Stackelberg game is exploited to derive optimal abatement and order quantity solutions under centralized and decentralized systems. The revenue-sharing and two-part tariff contracts are then proposed to coordinate the decentralized system with limited demand information. Numerical analyses complement the theoretical results. We list some major findings. Firstly, we discover that using abatement equipment can effectively reduce emissions and increase profits. Secondly, the distribution-free approach is effective and acceptable for a system where only mean and variance information is informed. Thirdly, the mean parameter has a greater impact on profits and emissions comparing with the other seven parameters. Finally, we show that both contracts may achieve perfect coordination, and the two-part tariff contract is more robust.

Research on contract coordination of supply chain under dual behavior preference based on Stackelberg model

“…However, the complexity of human behavior means that each member of the supply chain can have the dual preference of fairness concern and loss avoidance. (2) Most of the literature studies the models of revenue sharing contract [17,38,40] , wholesale price contract [25,43] and repurchase contract [52] , but few studies research on joint contract. With the extensive application of joint contract [61] , this paper discusses the combination of repurchase contract and revenue sharing contract.…”

Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility

“…Assumption 3. The market demand function for the product is assumed to be linear, with a being the total potential market demand, b = 1 being the sensitivity of demand to price, and a − bp > 0; λ being the sensitivity of consumers to the low-carbon level of the product [61], and the actual market demand being:…”