2005
DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2005.850598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Flexible Delegation-Type Interface Enhances System Performance in Human Supervision of Multiple Robots: Empirical Studies With RoboFlag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One common method used to deal with failures in robot autonomy is adjustable autonomy (Sellner, Simmons, & Singh, 2005;Brookshire, Singh, & Simmons, 2004;Miller, Funk, Goldman, Meisner, & Wu, 2005;Parasuraman, Galster, Squires, Furukawa, & Miller, 2005). Adjustable autonomy refers to the process of switching (at the discretion of either the user or the robot) to a different level of automation depending on the current circumstances.…”
Section: Adjustable Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common method used to deal with failures in robot autonomy is adjustable autonomy (Sellner, Simmons, & Singh, 2005;Brookshire, Singh, & Simmons, 2004;Miller, Funk, Goldman, Meisner, & Wu, 2005;Parasuraman, Galster, Squires, Furukawa, & Miller, 2005). Adjustable autonomy refers to the process of switching (at the discretion of either the user or the robot) to a different level of automation depending on the current circumstances.…”
Section: Adjustable Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This list includes (a) the conventional one-to-one relationship between human and robot, (b) teams of coordinating robots, such as arise in swarm robotics [16], [17] and "playbook-style" supervisory control [18], and (c) teams of coordinating humans managing one or more robots, such as those that have proven useful in search and rescue [6]. Yanco and Drury [15] intentionally left out the condition in which multiple operators controlled multiple robots without explicit coordination on either side since they felt that some explicit coordination was required, but "call center" metaphors have been proposed for MOSC with minimal coordination [19], [20].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has aimed to enable operators intuitive to understand the state of the functions and relationships between the functions. Functions were selected because results from the previous studies (Parasuraman et al, 2005) indicated that it was difficult to comprehend the states of the functions during plays. • Defensive sectors: Cooperation between defensive robots is a type of defensive function realized by a team of robots.…”
Section: Implementation Of Functional Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%