2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible drug delivery chip for the magnetically-controlled release of anti-epileptic drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, pulsatile drug delivery systems (PDDS) have drawn attention as they allow repeatable and reliable drug release flux for clinical needs. Further, external stimulation signals such as temperature variation, 9,10 magnetic fields, [11][12][13][14] and electric fields, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] can be used in PDDS to trigger or control drug release rates, thereby allowing remote control of local drug administration. Most of the PDDS devices are composed of a drug-loading container covered with a functional membrane, with drug release rates through the functional membrane controlled by modulating the external stimulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, pulsatile drug delivery systems (PDDS) have drawn attention as they allow repeatable and reliable drug release flux for clinical needs. Further, external stimulation signals such as temperature variation, 9,10 magnetic fields, [11][12][13][14] and electric fields, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] can be used in PDDS to trigger or control drug release rates, thereby allowing remote control of local drug administration. Most of the PDDS devices are composed of a drug-loading container covered with a functional membrane, with drug release rates through the functional membrane controlled by modulating the external stimulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Some preliminary studies using nanoparticles like liposomes and polymers to encapsulate antiepileptic agents have shown anticonvulsive effects in epilepsy models. [20][21][22] However, these studies still use inert nanocarriers without biological activity, which may affect their efficacy in P-gp mediated drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, some of these studies still used delivery of drugloaded nanoparticles via invasive routes, eg, local intracerebral implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were incubated for 2 days at 37°C with 200µl of either freshly prepared solutions of DTX at various concentrations or with the drug solution released from the device under various number of device actuations. Cell viability was 5 …”
Section: Controlled Release and Cell Viability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, external magnetic actuation using magnetic micropumps with microchannels and microvalves have been proposed for drug delivery [4]; however, most of these devices require relatively high pressure for operation (over 3 kPa) due to friction loss in the microchannels. A magnetic stimulus has been used as a trigger for antiepileptic drug release, both in vitro and in vivo, from a flexible membrane, made by electrodeposition of drug-carrying core-shell magnetic nanoparticles [5]. Although switchable release behavior was demonstrated, it may not be a suitable device for treatment of chronic diseases, where long-term drug release with highly controlled rates is desired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%