2016
DOI: 10.1002/sim.7071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible parametric approach to examining spatial variation in relative survival

Abstract: A flexible parametric approach to examining spatial variation in relative survival AbstractMost of the few published models used to obtain small-area estimates of relative survival are Advantages of this approach include the ease of including more realistic complexity, the feasibility of using individual-level input data, and the capacity to conduct overall, causespecific and relative survival analysis within the same framework. Spatial flexible parametric survival models have great potential for exploring sma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major field of research in cancer epidemiology is the assessment of spatial patterns of cancer. Substantial research has focused on assessing spatial patterns of cancer in different parts of the world [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The common sources of spatially referenced cancer data used for spatial analysis of cancer are population-based cancer registries; those are supplemented with additional population data, health survey data along with environmental and remote sensing data [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major field of research in cancer epidemiology is the assessment of spatial patterns of cancer. Substantial research has focused on assessing spatial patterns of cancer in different parts of the world [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The common sources of spatially referenced cancer data used for spatial analysis of cancer are population-based cancer registries; those are supplemented with additional population data, health survey data along with environmental and remote sensing data [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of events was assumed to follow a Poisson distribution, and two random effects were included in the model: a spatially structured random effect for local smoothing and an unstructured random effect global smoothing; Hennerfeind 9 proposed a Bayesian geoadditive relative survival model using penalized Psplines to model the log-baseline effect as well as the nonlinear and time-varying effects of covariates. Spatial and normal random effects were also included in the model formulation; Cramb et al 10 introduced a Bayesian flexible parametric model which extends a frequentist flexible parametric model on the log cumulative excess hazard scale using restricted cubic splines 20 by adding spatially structured random effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies regardless of the framework of inference, whether frequentist or Bayesian, although inferences for excess hazard models have mainly been based on the frequentist maximisation of the likelihood function. Very few options are available for inferences within the Bayesian framework [7][8][9][10] , in particular none describing the process of deriving a posterior distribution of net survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was fitted within the class of generalized linear mixed models by using maximum likelihood methods. In a Bayesian framework, a similar type of model with spatially correlated random effects has been used to assessing spatial variation in cancer survival by Fairley et al, Cramb et al, Saez et al, and Kang et al Recently, Cramb et al extended a flexible parametric model to estimation of spatial variation in excess mortality. The disadvantage of these Bayesian approaches is that they are computationally intensive because the models are fitted by using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INLA approach can be easily applied by using the R‐INLA package (www.r‐inla.org) to a wide variety of statistical models including generalized linear mixed models. In the estimation of excess mortality and net survival, the INLA approach has been mentioned as a possible solution to overcome the computational challenges related to the MCMC approaches, but to our knowledge, it has not been employed for the estimation in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%