2014
DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-7-295-2014
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible three-dimensional stratocumulus, cumulus and cirrus cloud generator (3DCLOUD) based on drastically simplified atmospheric equations and Fourier transform framework

Abstract: Abstract. The 3DCLOUD algorithm for generating stochastic three-dimensional (3-D) cloud fields is described in this paper. The generated outputs are 3-D optical depth (τ) for stratocumulus and cumulus fields and 3-D ice water content (IWC) for cirrus clouds. This model is designed to generate cloud fields that share some statistical properties observed in real clouds such as the inhomogeneity parameter ρ (standard deviation normalized by the mean of the studied quantity), the Fourier spectral slope β close to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean COTs, mean volume extinction coefficients, and the inhomogeneity factors of the regional cirrus cases are listed in Table . The inhomogeneity factor was calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation of COT to the domain‐averaged COT (Szczap et al, ). Given that the inhomogeneity factor was almost the same for Case 1 (M1 and T1) and Case 2 (M2 and T2), Case 2 was optically thicker than Case 1.…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Cirrus Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean COTs, mean volume extinction coefficients, and the inhomogeneity factors of the regional cirrus cases are listed in Table . The inhomogeneity factor was calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation of COT to the domain‐averaged COT (Szczap et al, ). Given that the inhomogeneity factor was almost the same for Case 1 (M1 and T1) and Case 2 (M2 and T2), Case 2 was optically thicker than Case 1.…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Cirrus Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%