1979
DOI: 10.1021/i160072a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Flow Calorimeter for Condensable Gases at Low Temperatures and High Pressures. 1. Design and Evaluation

Abstract: A flow calorimeter has been developed for measuring enthalpy-temperature curves of condensable gases. Measurements can be carried out over small temperature intervals and at low temperatures and high pressures. Rather low mass flow rates are used so that recirculation of the sample is unnecessary. A correction for heat losses is made. The absolute error of the final results is within 1 %.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a maximum error in the temperature interval of 0.002 K. These differences are insignificant in this comparison, and are not corrected for. There is an average deviation of 2.12 per cent between our measurements and the measurements by Van Kasteren et al (5) In table 2 our isobaric Dh measurements on ethane are compared with calculations from the Friend et al …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is also a maximum error in the temperature interval of 0.002 K. These differences are insignificant in this comparison, and are not corrected for. There is an average deviation of 2.12 per cent between our measurements and the measurements by Van Kasteren et al (5) In table 2 our isobaric Dh measurements on ethane are compared with calculations from the Friend et al …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These are Van Kasteren et al (5) and Furtado. (6) Our measurements are compared with the measurements from these sources in table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig. 5 we show a comparison of our crossover equation with experimental Ce data reported by Kasteren and Zeldenrust [39] and by Jones et al…”
Section: Methanementioning
confidence: 57%