2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.riam.2014.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flow cytometry method for testing the susceptibility of Cryptococcus spp. to amphotericin B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Teodoro et al (2013) Susceptibility profile of clinical and environmental isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii Andrade-Silva et al (2013) A flow cytometry method for testing the susceptibility of Cryptococcus spp. to AmB Benaducci et al (2015) In vitro susceptibility testing of AmB for C. neoformans variety grubii AFLP1/VNI and C. gattii AFLP6/VGII by CLSI and flow cytometry Morales et al (2015) Heteroresistance to ITZ and changes in the morphology and virulence of C. gattii Ferreira et al (2015) Antifungal susceptibility of clinical C. deuterogattii (AFLP6/VGII) isolates from Southern Brazil Herkert et al (2016) Resistance to FCZ and changes on virulence and morphological aspects of C. neoformans and C. gattii Rossi et al (2016) Antifungal susceptibility testing and genotyping characterization of C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates from HIV-infected patients Figueiredo et al (2016) Evaluation of antifungal combination against Cryptococcus spp. Reichert-Lima et al (2016) C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates from both HIV-infected and uninfected patients: antifungal susceptibility and outcome of cryptococcal disease Nascimento et al (2017) FCZ non-susceptible C. neoformans .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Teodoro et al (2013) Susceptibility profile of clinical and environmental isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii Andrade-Silva et al (2013) A flow cytometry method for testing the susceptibility of Cryptococcus spp. to AmB Benaducci et al (2015) In vitro susceptibility testing of AmB for C. neoformans variety grubii AFLP1/VNI and C. gattii AFLP6/VGII by CLSI and flow cytometry Morales et al (2015) Heteroresistance to ITZ and changes in the morphology and virulence of C. gattii Ferreira et al (2015) Antifungal susceptibility of clinical C. deuterogattii (AFLP6/VGII) isolates from Southern Brazil Herkert et al (2016) Resistance to FCZ and changes on virulence and morphological aspects of C. neoformans and C. gattii Rossi et al (2016) Antifungal susceptibility testing and genotyping characterization of C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates from HIV-infected patients Figueiredo et al (2016) Evaluation of antifungal combination against Cryptococcus spp. Reichert-Lima et al (2016) C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates from both HIV-infected and uninfected patients: antifungal susceptibility and outcome of cryptococcal disease Nascimento et al (2017) FCZ non-susceptible C. neoformans .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several additional techniques have been developed to simplify the standard ones, such as, time kill curves (TKC), E-Test strips, and a disk diffusion method ( Ochiuzzi et al 2010 , Córdoba et al 2015 , de Oliveira et al 2017 ). Recently, the use of flow cytometry (FC) was evaluated in two publications, which both showed a positive significant correlation ( Benaducci et al 2015 , Morales et al 2015 ). In one of them, the conclusion was that FC has an excellent correlation with the standard methods, and it is a reliable, fast, and safe method to test the susceptibility to AmB ( Benaducci et al 2015 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amplification of DNA-extracted blood samples is hampered by the presence of hemoglobin and anticoagulants [35,36]. Some DNA extraction businesses address this issue by incorporating treatment stages to eliminate potential inhibitors, which can be a problem with other methods.…”
Section: End-point Pcr-based Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pore et al first proposed PI and rose Bengal to analyze cell viability in the context of AFST (Pore, 1990). Since these promising results, many studies have used PI but further results were less conclusive depending on the drug and the experimental protocols (Pore, 1991;Green et al, 1994;Ramani and Chaturvedi, 2000;Chaturvedi et al, 2004;Benaducci et al, 2015). Besides PI, the two most promising fluorescent probes in AFST are AO and FUN-1.…”
Section: Principle and Dyesmentioning
confidence: 99%