2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fluorescence-based analysis of aristolochic acid-derived DNA adducts

Abstract: Aristolochic acids (AAs), major components of plant extracts from Aristolochia species form, after metabolic activation, pro-mutagenic DNA adducts in renal tissue. The DNA adducts can be used as biomarkers for studies of AA toxicity. Identification of these adducts is a complicated and time-consuming procedure. We present herein a fast, non-isotopic, fluorescence-based assay for the detection of AA-DNA adducts in multiple samples. This approach allows analysis of AA adducts in synthetic DNA with known nucleoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At confluency of 80%‐90%, the cells were exposed for 24 hours to AAI at different concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 20 μ m (final concentration in the DMEM without serum) added from 200 times concentrated stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide. In line with previous studies (Romanov, Sidorenko, Rosenquist, Whyard, & Grollman, 2012; Sidorenko et al, 2014), exposure of cells to AAI was performed in serum‐free medium to prevent binding of AAI to serum proteins, which would decrease the free concentration of AAI to which the cells were exposed (Dickman, Sweet, Bonala, Ray, & Wu, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At confluency of 80%‐90%, the cells were exposed for 24 hours to AAI at different concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 20 μ m (final concentration in the DMEM without serum) added from 200 times concentrated stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide. In line with previous studies (Romanov, Sidorenko, Rosenquist, Whyard, & Grollman, 2012; Sidorenko et al, 2014), exposure of cells to AAI was performed in serum‐free medium to prevent binding of AAI to serum proteins, which would decrease the free concentration of AAI to which the cells were exposed (Dickman, Sweet, Bonala, Ray, & Wu, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In vitro DNA adduct formation was determined using LLC‐PK1 cells, which are proximal tubular cells from pig kidney that have been frequently used to assess in vitro AAI‐induced toxicity (Balachandran, Wei, Lin, Khan, & Pasco, 2005; Hsin et al, 2006; Romanov et al, 2012). Although AAI‐DNA adduct formation in pig cells may differ from AAI‐DNA adduct formation in kidney cells of rat, mouse and human, we predicted the DNA adduct levels for these three using this cell line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, noninvasive and less expensive methodology will be required for biomonitoring. In this regard, a fluorescence-based assay has been developed for adduct detection …”
Section: Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, a fluorescence-based assay has been developed for adduct detection. 139 10. FUTURE DIRECTIONS 10.1.…”
Section: Repair Of Dna Adductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described CZE method displayed an outstanding detection of AA-I in Chinese medicine with detection limits of 0.6 and 0.05 µg mL −1 using CZE-UV and CZE-MS detectors, respectively. Furthermore, the literature survey reported a spectroscopic technique based on fluorescence analysis for the detection of AA-I derived DNA adducts in renal tissues (13). Finally, an electrochemical detection method based on square wave voltammetry was introduced to detect AA-I in Chinese medicinal plants with a limit of detection of 1.6 × 10 −8 mol L −1 (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%