2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fluorescence-based assay for measuring the viable cell concentration of mixed microbial communities in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inference is that LIVE/DEAD ® BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit may not be suitable for mixed populations of unknown species. This view is supported by a study which investigated the proportions of live and dead bacteria in soil samples which proved unsuccessful despite complex mathematical compensations and careful dilution procedures (Pascaud et al, 2009). …”
Section: Dye Based Methods For Viability and Vitalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inference is that LIVE/DEAD ® BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit may not be suitable for mixed populations of unknown species. This view is supported by a study which investigated the proportions of live and dead bacteria in soil samples which proved unsuccessful despite complex mathematical compensations and careful dilution procedures (Pascaud et al, 2009). …”
Section: Dye Based Methods For Viability and Vitalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a shift to applying fluorophore-based assays to environmental samples. The fluorescence light re-emitted from excited fluorophores may be measured using various forms of epifluorescence microscopy, flow cytometers, and microplate readers among others (Pascaud et al 2009;Cai et al 2014). Few studies have incorporated the use of microplate readers, although it has been proposed that rapid and accurate readings of fluorescence produced from fluorophores used in viability assays may be performed directly by using these readers (Pascaud et al 2009;Cai et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence light re-emitted from excited fluorophores may be measured using various forms of epifluorescence microscopy, flow cytometers, and microplate readers among others (Pascaud et al 2009;Cai et al 2014). Few studies have incorporated the use of microplate readers, although it has been proposed that rapid and accurate readings of fluorescence produced from fluorophores used in viability assays may be performed directly by using these readers (Pascaud et al 2009;Cai et al 2014). However, it has been reported that simply extrapolating previously established protocols for fluorophores in combination with microplate readers can cause poor results, and it is therefore necessary for samplespecific optimization (Pascaud et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that the TBN values estimated by AO and BacLight staining are relatively accurate and interchangeable for quantitative interpretation and that IA provides better precision than does VC. As a prudent measure, it is suggested to avoid use of DAPI staining for comparative studies investigating accuracy of novel cell-counting methods.Bacterial abundance is an instrumental parameter in assessing the roles of bacteria in the environments (18,27,30,45). While a variety of techniques are available (1,30,53,60), staining bacterial cells with acridine orange (AO) (29) or 4Ј,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (48) and counting them on black polycarbonate (PC) filters by epifluorescence microscopy have become the standard procedure for direct counting (9,18,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial abundance is an instrumental parameter in assessing the roles of bacteria in the environments (18,27,30,45). While a variety of techniques are available (1,30,53,60), staining bacterial cells with acridine orange (AO) (29) or 4Ј,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (48) and counting them on black polycarbonate (PC) filters by epifluorescence microscopy have become the standard procedure for direct counting (9,18,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%