2002
DOI: 10.1002/col.10109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fluorescent extension to the Kubelka–Munk model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore assumed here that S is independent of the FWA concentration, allowing its determination from the undyed sample. This assumption is made in contradiction with the findings of Shakespeare and Shakespeare (2003), who showed that S was decreasing with increasing K, and hence was dependent on the FWA concentration. On the other hand, B in Eq 2 is only dependent on the ratio…”
Section: Optical Characterisation Of the Samplescontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is therefore assumed here that S is independent of the FWA concentration, allowing its determination from the undyed sample. This assumption is made in contradiction with the findings of Shakespeare and Shakespeare (2003), who showed that S was decreasing with increasing K, and hence was dependent on the FWA concentration. On the other hand, B in Eq 2 is only dependent on the ratio…”
Section: Optical Characterisation Of the Samplescontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Modelling fluorescence with an extended KubelkaMunk model For a medium of infinite thickness, the Kokhanovsky (2009;2010) model gives the same equation as the one obtained by Shakespeare and Shakespeare (2003) and Allen (1964). The Donaldson matrix is computed from the scattering and absorption coefficients, and the quantum efficiency through…”
Section: Optical Characterisation Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent spectral prediction models dealing with the fluorescence phenomenon were focussed mainly on the fluorescence of inks [15][16][17]. They rely on a twoflux approach similar to the Kubelka-Munk theory.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light scattering in paper is most frequently modelled with the Kubelka-Munk (1931;1948) theory (KM). The KM theory relates two reflectance factor measurements to a scattering coefficient, S, and an absorption coefficient, K. Several extensions of the KM theory have been developed over the years to account for fluorescence (Allen 1964;Fukshansky, Kazarinova 1980;Bonham 1986;Shakespeare 2000;Shakespeare and Shakespeare 2003). However, the use of these extensions is limited to either a defined polychromatic illumination or to a semi-infinite layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%