“…Although, these in vivo assays were useful, involvement of radioactivity or having to transfuse incompatible blood without any preconception of outcome is dangerous; so, in the early 1980s, investigators began in earnest to try and address the clinical significance of detected RBC antibodies by designing in vitro cellular assays to mimic the in vivo environment (Branch, Gallagher, Mison, Sy Siok Hian, & Petz, 1984; Conley et al., 1982; Gallagher, Branch, Mison, & Petz, 1983; Hunt, Beck, Hardman, Tegtmeier, & Bayer, 1980; Schanfield, Schoeppner, & Stevens, 1980; Stevens, Schanfield, & Braley, 1976). Assays to assess the potential for an antibody to cause hemolysis of transfused red blood cells in patients having the corresponding alloantibody included a chemiluminescence test (CLT; Downing, Templeton, Mitchell, & Fraser, 1990; Hadley, Wilkes, Poole, Arndt, & Garratty, 1999; Lucas, Hadley, Nance, & Garratty, 1993), monocyte‐macrophage assays (MMAs; Tong & Branch, 2017; Tong, Burke‐Murphy, et al., 2016; Zupanska, 1985), flow cytometry (Balola, Mayer, Bartolmas, & Salama, 2021), and less characterized assays such as antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC; Barcellini, 2015). Herein, we provide detailed protocols for the MMA and ADCC assays for use to determine the clinical significance of antibodies in patients requiring transfusion of serologically incompatible donor blood.…”