2021
DOI: 10.1109/ojap.2021.3127312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Foldable Reflectarray on a Hexagonal Twist Origami Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al 2 used the natural coordinate formulation to construct the model for a spacecraft with two flexible solar panels which are reduced by Craig-Bampton component modal synthesis. Rubio et al 3 designed a novel deployable flat panel reflectarray antenna (RA) on an origami folding pattern for small satellite applications. Nagaraj et al 4 proposed a theoretical model along with an experimental set-up to study the dynamics of a two-link flexible system simulating the two panels undergoing locking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al 2 used the natural coordinate formulation to construct the model for a spacecraft with two flexible solar panels which are reduced by Craig-Bampton component modal synthesis. Rubio et al 3 designed a novel deployable flat panel reflectarray antenna (RA) on an origami folding pattern for small satellite applications. Nagaraj et al 4 proposed a theoretical model along with an experimental set-up to study the dynamics of a two-link flexible system simulating the two panels undergoing locking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used the natural coordinate formulation to construct the model for a spacecraft with two flexible solar panels which are reduced by Craig‐Bampton component modal synthesis. Rubio et al 3 . designed a novel deployable flat panel reflectarray antenna (RA) on an origami folding pattern for small satellite applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By wire-control, it means that conducting wires are used to transmit control signals to tunable components or materials for reconfiguring the distribution of aperture fields. Three methods are typically used for designing reconfigurable microstrip RAs, where the electrical method is mostly adopted [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], compared to the mechanical method [23], [24], [25], [26] and optical method recently proposed [27], [28], [29]. For the electrical method, the key is to design the reconfigurable elements with tunable components or tunable materials, such as the positive-intrinsicnegative (p-i-n) diode switches [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], varactors [9], [10], [11], microelectromechanical (MEMS) switches [12], [13], [14], liquid crystals (LCs) [15], [16], [17], [18], phase-changing materials [19], ferroelectric materials [20], and graphene…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most popular types of mechanically reconfigurable antennas are those referred to as Origami Antennas (OA) as they take their inspiration from the Japanese art of paper folding. Origami antennas have been implemented in extensive ways, ranging from helical antennas capable of switching their radiating pattern polarization 11 , reducing system costs by utilizing paper as a substrate structure 12 , and frequency selective surfaces and deployable reflecting surfaces 13 , 14 . The biggest drawback of OAs is that specific behaviors and material performance assumptions need to be made in order to realize targeted functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, when the incorporation of thin, flexible substrates (with signal or power traces) is used to replace traditional hinges in folded/deployable applications, upon creasing the substrate and traces, they experience deterioration of not only their mechanical integrity, but also their electrical performance, through material fatigue failure and cracking. These types of designs must still utilize additional supports to improve their structural integrity, which in turn increases their complexity and cost 11 , 12 , 14 , 19 . The limitations of thin and flexible substrates with minimal mechanical supporting structures can be seen in the real-world example of the Hubble telescope’s deployable boom and flat panel solar array structure experiencing jitter during orbital day-night crossings 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%