2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(00)00171-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A food frequency questionnaire for youth: psychometric analysis and summary of eating habits in adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A high consumption of fats and sugar was observed (35,36), similar to the findings of the present study, as well as insufficient consumption of the group of breads and vegetables (36). A study conducted on American adolescents revealed that neither sex reached the intake of the portions recommended by the American Food Pyramid, except for dairy products (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A high consumption of fats and sugar was observed (35,36), similar to the findings of the present study, as well as insufficient consumption of the group of breads and vegetables (36). A study conducted on American adolescents revealed that neither sex reached the intake of the portions recommended by the American Food Pyramid, except for dairy products (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Rockett et al 5 , the Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.26 for protein and iron to 0.58 for calcium. The correlations observed by Speck et al 24 ranged from 0.08 to 0.76, with a two-week interval between applications of the questionnaire. Field et al 25 , assessing the performance of a frequency questionnaire applied with a one-year interval, found correlations from 0.18 to 0.47.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The Pearson correlation coeffi cients of a food frequency questionnaire for youth ranged from 0.26 for protein and iron to 0.58 for calcium [Rockett et al, 1995]. In other studies with a two-week interval between applications of the questionnaire, the correlations ranged from 0.08 to 0.76 [Speck et al, 2001] and with a one-year interval correlations were from 0.18 to 0.47 [Field et al, 1999].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%