A Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Modality on Prosecutors’ Resolutions

Abstract

Prosecutors are individuals assigned to resolve cases filed on courts. Their abilities to make keenly decisions provided a wide spectrum on the world of forensic linguistics. This study aimed at identifying the types of modals used and their functions in the prosecutors’ resolutions of different cases. Further, this forensic linguistic analysis determined the frequency of overused and misused modals. Anchored on the premise of Palmer (2001) on the types and functions of modals, this study found that the common speculative modality is -may. Deductive modality included modals such as -shall, -must, -would, -may, and -could. As appeared, modal -could was categorized under the reported modality. Permissives were -can, -cannot, -will, -would, and -must. Modals were used to predict, give the possibility, capability, and permission, necessity, requirement, and prescription. The modal -would appeared 14 times among the prosecutors’ resolutions. Implications for legal parlance and educational milieu were presented.

Illocutionary Acts in Courtroom Proceedings: The Contexts of Local Courts in the Philippines

“…Studies relative to courtroom proceedings were accentuated in the parlance of types of questions (Catoto, 2017) and the utilization of different types of modals using the prosecutors' resolutions (Catoto, 2022). However, the current study focused on identifying the different types of illocutionary acts as mentioned in the Transcript of Stenographers' Notes.…”