1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formal analysis of stressor and stress‐proneness effects on simple information processing

Abstract: This study examined visual information processing under a stressor of recurring loud sound among groups divided according to psychometrically identified stress susceptibility. Formal models of task performance were employed to address several issues concerning stress effects on cognitive functioning. Examined were effects on parallel versus serial processing structure, task-wise processing capacity, strategies of allocating processing resources to task components, and curtailment of processing of relevant task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, their common impairment by Alcohol words suggests that salience may reduce the ability to voluntarily allocate resources to the criterion task (Verbruggen et al, 2004). The intensification of the word type effect by stress is consistent with this explanation, as stress has been found to deplete cognitive resources (Hancock et al, 2007;Hockey, 1997;Neufeld and McCarty, 1994). At the same time, the inverse correlation between Go RT and SSRT suggests that whichever process demands fewer resourcesFthe default responseFwill be enhanced at the expense of the other process.…”
Section: Stress and Alcohol Cues On Go-stop Responding M Zack Et Almentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As such, their common impairment by Alcohol words suggests that salience may reduce the ability to voluntarily allocate resources to the criterion task (Verbruggen et al, 2004). The intensification of the word type effect by stress is consistent with this explanation, as stress has been found to deplete cognitive resources (Hancock et al, 2007;Hockey, 1997;Neufeld and McCarty, 1994). At the same time, the inverse correlation between Go RT and SSRT suggests that whichever process demands fewer resourcesFthe default responseFwill be enhanced at the expense of the other process.…”
Section: Stress and Alcohol Cues On Go-stop Responding M Zack Et Almentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For example, fascinating results have been forthcoming in applications of mathematical models and their associated experimental paradigms to clinical studies of psychopathology (e.g., McFall & Townsend, 1998;McFall & Treat, in press;Neufeld & McCarty, 1994). Theories in decision making, long the sole province of modified versions of subjective expected utility theory, are being influenced by quantitative information-processing theory (e.g., Busemeyer & Townsend, 1993), and certain developments from formal decision making are beginning to impact theory about process models (e.g., Marley & Colonius, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional candidate source of stimulus degradation is psychological stress (definitions, and formal treatments of stress effects on cognition are presented in Paterson and Neufeld (1989), Neufeld (1990), Neufeld (1996), Neufeld and McCarty (1994), ). Psychological stress thus may further stochastically erode processing rate (increasing hyperparameter r).…”
Section: Extensions To Thought-content Disorder (Delusions and Thematmentioning
confidence: 99%