2012 20th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icnp.2012.6459961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formally-verified migration protocol for mobile, multi-homed hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serval, a service-centric architecture, promotes services as first-class entities, as described in detail in prior work [25,2]. The main goals of Serval are threefold: support replicated instances of a single service, support multihomed access to services, and allow for mobility at the connection endpoints.…”
Section: Case Study #2: Servalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serval, a service-centric architecture, promotes services as first-class entities, as described in detail in prior work [25,2]. The main goals of Serval are threefold: support replicated instances of a single service, support multihomed access to services, and allow for mobility at the connection endpoints.…”
Section: Case Study #2: Servalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the three principals used in our exemplifying demo ( §6.1) required only a modest engineering effort: the U4ID principal took 480 lines of source code, the zFilter principal 437 lines, and the XDP principal 724 lines according to SLOCCount [32]. We also reused the full POSIX API, the kernel module mechanism, and the hardware abstraction layer available in the kernel to achieve three goals: (1) provide XIA applications a rich API, (2) clearly scope principals code to avoid static dependencies, and (3) be fully independent of TCP/IP. None of these features are available in the XIA prototype [12].…”
Section: Implementation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of building the model, we found bugs with both our original design and with an earlier mobility protocol [10]. Further details of the protocol and model can be found elsewhere [11].…”
Section: Iia Serval Mobility and Multi-homingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general consensus [52,13,26] that end-to-end connection migration, i.e., bilaterally without relying on an external service, suffices to migrate connections efficiently when endpoints move one at a time, but an external resolution service is needed to support concurrent mobility. Although the latter is seen as a rare case in most connection migration work, it can be common in disconnection-tolerant, mobile application scenarios, e.g., when a user closes her laptop at home and opens it at a coffee shop to continue watching a movie, by which time the cloud-hosted virtual server may have been migrated for load balancing.…”
Section: Internet Mobility Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%