2012
DOI: 10.14227/dt190412p14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Formulation Case Study Comparing the Dynamic Gastric Model with Conventional Dissolution Methods

Abstract: Even in the 21st century, conventional compendial dissolution testing remains a key cornerstone of the drug development process and quality control testing. However, opportunities exist with respect to in vitro technology developments that provide the potential for formulation and analytical scientists to exceed the capabilities of the conventional dissolution test toward a more biorelevant testing regime. This work presents a product development case study in which bioequivalence was observed between an immed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good overview on those systems addressing hydrodynamic conditions of the GI has been provided by Pentafragka et al (3). Some outstanding models that allow dissolution profiling of oral solid dosage forms under dynamic conditions are the fed stomach model (FSM) by Koziolek et al, the dynamic gastric model (DGM) from the Institute for Food Research (Norwich, UK), and the TIM-1 model from TNO Triskelion (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Determination Of Dissolution Profile and Bioaccessibility Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good overview on those systems addressing hydrodynamic conditions of the GI has been provided by Pentafragka et al (3). Some outstanding models that allow dissolution profiling of oral solid dosage forms under dynamic conditions are the fed stomach model (FSM) by Koziolek et al, the dynamic gastric model (DGM) from the Institute for Food Research (Norwich, UK), and the TIM-1 model from TNO Triskelion (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Determination Of Dissolution Profile and Bioaccessibility Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current in vitro methods used in the study of disintegration and dissolution of oral solid dosage forms do not provide a physiological representation of the dynamic biochemical and physical environment of the human stomach (Vardakou et al 2011a ) and are therefore sometimes not predictive of the in vivo behaviour of dosage forms, particularly in the case of dosing with or after a typical meal. The DGM is well placed to bridge the gap between these simpler dissolution tests and in vivo studies (animal or human) and can be used in either to explain unexpected in vivo results, or as a predictive tool (Mann and Pygall 2012 ;Wickham et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Pharmaceutical-based Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study (17), the intention was to create a bilayer tablet containing multiple APIs in an immediate-release (IR) layer and a nondisintegrating controlled-release layer, then match the in vivo performance of a reference product of the drug contained within the immediate-release layer. In USP dissolution Apparatus 2 ( Figure 3A), the immediate-release layer behaved similarly when compressed as a single-entity tablet or a bilayer formulation.…”
Section: Bioequivalence Of Complex Dosage Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%