2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A foundational theory of ethical decision-making: The case of marketing professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People’s identities are at the core of their decision-making processes and consumption behaviors (Lim et al , 2023). Individuals tend to align their actions with their salient identities (Costa Pinto et al , 2014), which are defined as the conditions under which people are cognitively emphasized by a particular identity, which then shapes their perceptions and behaviors accordingly (Turner et al , 1987).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People’s identities are at the core of their decision-making processes and consumption behaviors (Lim et al , 2023). Individuals tend to align their actions with their salient identities (Costa Pinto et al , 2014), which are defined as the conditions under which people are cognitively emphasized by a particular identity, which then shapes their perceptions and behaviors accordingly (Turner et al , 1987).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors directly affect the purchasing behavior of sustainable products (Borin et al, 2011). In turn, awareness impacts consumer attitudes toward sustainable consumption practices (Chen & Lee, 2015; Lim et al, 2023). Within, awareness is analyzed as a multidimensional variable explained by brand awareness, environmental awareness, and ethical awareness (Montiel & Delgado‐Ballester, 2019; Mostaghel & Chirumalla, 2021; Nigam & Chandra, 2020; Sinha & Sreejesh, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the status quo is a critical step of developing the critique, and it should be done in a way that conveys the message that critics and change advocates are deeply aware and truly knowledgeable about the conventions of the status quo. To do so, critics and change advocates can (i) Conceptualize (i.e., define) and operationalize (i.e., measure) the issue (e.g., ethical decision making, intention–behavior gap, technology adoption) and the methods available to learn about and address that issue (e.g., concepts, frameworks, models, taxonomies, and/or theories) (see Lim, 2018b; Lim & Weissmann, 2023; Lim, O'Connor et al., 2023). (ii) Explain the current trajectory and prevalent trends in relation to (i) (e.g., the “what”, “why”, “when”, “who”, and/or “how” of the past and the present), which can come from existing and/or new reviews of the field (and thus highlighting the value of review studies—see Kraus et al., 2022; Lim, 2022c; Lim, Kumar & Ali, 2022; Paul et al., 2021).…”
Section: How To Develop a Critique And Propose A Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarifying the big picture sets the scene of what the change proposal endeavors to achieve. This can be done by explaining, and if possible, illustrating, the desired state alongside its implications (see Lim, O'Connor et al., 2023). As opportunities are infinite, disclosing the target categories (e.g., economic, environmental, and social performance) and specifying exemplars (e.g., economic—e.g., profitability, revenue; environmental—e.g., carbon emission, energy consumption; social—e.g., diversity) of the desired state could be done.…”
Section: How To Develop a Critique And Propose A Changementioning
confidence: 99%