“…Acknowledging the status quo is a critical step of developing the critique, and it should be done in a way that conveys the message that critics and change advocates are deeply aware and truly knowledgeable about the conventions of the status quo. To do so, critics and change advocates can - (i) Conceptualize (i.e., define) and operationalize (i.e., measure) the issue (e.g., ethical decision making, intention–behavior gap, technology adoption) and the methods available to learn about and address that issue (e.g., concepts, frameworks, models, taxonomies, and/or theories) (see Lim, 2018b; Lim & Weissmann, 2023; Lim, O'Connor et al., 2023).
- (ii) Explain the current trajectory and prevalent trends in relation to (i) (e.g., the “what”, “why”, “when”, “who”, and/or “how” of the past and the present), which can come from existing and/or new reviews of the field (and thus highlighting the value of review studies—see Kraus et al., 2022; Lim, 2022c; Lim, Kumar & Ali, 2022; Paul et al., 2021).
…”