2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/wi-iat.2013.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Four Dimension Graph Model for Automatic Text Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But, the proposed method in this paper has been evaluated with three model summaries of each test document. The remarkable point is that human generated model summaries were also used for English text summarization methods despite the existence of benchmark dataset [48,49] and for other languages where there was no benchmark dataset [6,7,20]. At last, ROUGE [50] has been applied, a widely used metric, to evaluate the automatically generated summaries of our proposed method.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the proposed method in this paper has been evaluated with three model summaries of each test document. The remarkable point is that human generated model summaries were also used for English text summarization methods despite the existence of benchmark dataset [48,49] and for other languages where there was no benchmark dataset [6,7,20]. At last, ROUGE [50] has been applied, a widely used metric, to evaluate the automatically generated summaries of our proposed method.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two methods are simple and ignore some effective factors, such as semantic information and linguistic knowledge. Above all [30,31], these methods are all considered more similar to judge the relevance between nodes. Corresponding solutions of these limitations are proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Graph Sorting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even then, none of the existing lemmatization algorithm can yield 100 % accurate result. These inappropriate base words generated will affect accuracy of dependency parsing [2], which will directly affect the identification of the relation between the concepts to provide a meaningful knowledge [3][4][5]. As a result it will eventually affect the overall accuracy of semantic knowledge the knowledge base trying to represent [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%