2020
DOI: 10.1002/pol.20200144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy‐based method for tracking diffusion in organogels

Abstract: Organogels possess characteristics that make them promising materials for enhancing our understanding of nanostructure‐diffusion relationships in gels and for use in diffusion‐centered applications including drug delivery and nanoreactor media. Unlike hydrogels, however, there are no well‐recognized techniques for measuring the fundamental diffusion parameter of diffusivity, D, in organogels. The present work establishes a technique for measuring D based upon Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy. Physically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanostructure dimensions are quantified and compared by fitting each data set with an appropriate model. By considering both reverse micelles and crosslinks as spherical domains, 34–37 I ( q ) can be represented by I()q=ϕRMρRM2VRMPRM()q+ϕcrρcr2VcrPcr()qScr()q+italicbkg where ϕ i , Δ ρ i , and P i ( q ) are the volume fraction, scattering length density contrast (see Table S1), and q ‐dependent form factor of i domains, respectively, V i is the volume of a single i domain, S cr ( q ) is the q‐ dependent crosslink domain structure factor, and bkg is the incoherent scattering background. A reverse micelle structure factor does not appear in Equation due to gels' low AOT concentration, which causes S RM ( q ) → 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nanostructure dimensions are quantified and compared by fitting each data set with an appropriate model. By considering both reverse micelles and crosslinks as spherical domains, 34–37 I ( q ) can be represented by I()q=ϕRMρRM2VRMPRM()q+ϕcrρcr2VcrPcr()qScr()q+italicbkg where ϕ i , Δ ρ i , and P i ( q ) are the volume fraction, scattering length density contrast (see Table S1), and q ‐dependent form factor of i domains, respectively, V i is the volume of a single i domain, S cr ( q ) is the q‐ dependent crosslink domain structure factor, and bkg is the incoherent scattering background. A reverse micelle structure factor does not appear in Equation due to gels' low AOT concentration, which causes S RM ( q ) → 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanostructure dimensions are quantified and compared by fitting each data set with an appropriate model. By considering both reverse micelles and crosslinks as spherical domains, [34][35][36][37] I(q) can be represented by…”
Section: Nanostructure Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gels were regularly extracted from these solutions for transmission FTIR and gravimetric analysis. The latter validated that no significant swelling of gels occurred during diffusion experiments, whereas the former enabled retained mass profiles to be determined based upon peak absorbance values [18].…”
Section: Diffusion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…1.7 nm. Gels were initially formulated with 10 wt%, 20 wt%, or 30 wt% copolymer and 0.5 wt% OA or 1.0 wt% AOT (values based on previous work [17,18]), resulting in six series (in each series, the MO identity was varied). Note, 1.0 wt% AOT loading resulted in cloudy gels for HB 550 and HB 1000 MOs, suggesting that precipitation occurred.…”
Section: Gel Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation