Overbeeke and Draisma have recently published [i] results of fatigue tests on heavy-duty spot welded lap joints. The tests were carried out in air under zero to tension loading and the results were ~nalysed in terms of load. However a spot weld is equivalent to a crack-like flaw, so that virtually the whole life is occupied by fatigue crack growth, and a fracture mechanics analysis becomes appropriate [2]. Of the six test series reported, II, III, and IV were carried out on spot-welded lap joints, and the results obtained are used in the present paper for an analysis in terms of stress intensity factors, which describe the elastic stress field in the vicinity of a crack tip.Series II tests were on single spot welds ( Fig. i@) between plates of grade 37 KF steel (0.2% proof stress 260 FIN/m'). Spot diameters were in the range 7 to 23 mm, and individual spot diameters [3] are used in the calculation of stress intensity factors. Series III tests were on single spot w~ids between plates of grade 56 KF steel (0.2% proof stress 475 ~/ m ). Spot diameters were in the range 18 to 22 rm, but as individual spot diameters are not available, the average is used to calculate stress intensity factors. The possible error due to use of the average diameter is 11%. Series IV tests were on two spot welds in line (Fig. ib) between plates of grade 56 KF steel. Spot diameters were in the range 18 to 22 mm, the average again being used to calculate stress intensity factors and giving a possible error of 16%. In all tests, cracks originated at a point A (Fig. I) in the parent plate. The subsequent pattern of crack growth was complicated, but final failure was generally in the parent plate, except that nearly half the testpieces in the series II tests failed across the weld.Approximate opening mode K_ and edge sliding mode KII stress intensity factors at point A (Fi&. I) are [4] as follows. For a single spot weld, radius a, between plates thickness 2b, with a/b <_ I0 and o
(2)For two spot welds in line, with centres at least three spot diameters apart, and 1.92 < a/b < i0, KII is the same andInt Journ of Fracture ii (1975) 174In (i) to (3), Q is the applied load per spot weld. The edge of a spot weld must be at least one spot diameter from a plate edge.In fatigue crack growth problems, stress intensity factors can be taken as providing a reasonable description of the stress field at the crack tip provided that the net section stress does not exceed 80% of the yield stress [5]. Results are therefore discarded if the average shear stress on the weld exceeds 80% of the nominal shear yield stress, which is taken as half the 0.2% proof stress of the parent plate. Application of this limitation eliminates one series IV result and nearly half the series II results. The results eliminated are nearly all those where weld failure took place, which suggests that shear failure of a weld is associated with yielding. This agrees with the observation that mode II fatigue crack growth can take place under general yielding conditions [6] whereas, under ...